Search for: "Stacks v. United States"
Results 61 - 80
of 532
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2022, 4:30 am
Here I'll say a word about three odd-numbered amendments, which I'll take in reverse order.Eleventh Amendment: By its terms, the Eleventh Amendment bars suits "against one of the United States by citizens of another state," but in 1890 in Hans v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 10:20 am
Rather than rely on gender-based stereotypes about which parent is best suited to take care of the child, the goal of most courts in the United States is to protect the child’s best interest. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 10:20 am
Rather than rely on gender-based stereotypes about which parent is best suited to take care of the child, the goal of most courts in the United States is to protect the child’s best interest. [read post]
12 Mar 2022, 4:23 pm
From Hiers v. [read post]
20 Feb 2022, 2:19 pm
They state there that ’we present empirical evidence of “hold-up”—i.e., evidence of opportunistic behavior by SEP enforcers that is intended to unreasonably inflate royalties. [read post]
9 Feb 2022, 7:18 am
In 1964, she took up the second important case of her career, United States v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 11:35 am
Only two weeks after I said that Apple was facing an "Epicsson" dilemma because of contradictory positions in connection with app distribution on the one hand (30% "app tax") and standard-essential patents (SEPs) on the other hand (spending only about 1-2% of its sales on patent licenses but complaining about "royalty stacking"), Apple has submitted to the United States International Trade Commission a public interest statement that says the… [read post]
21 Jan 2022, 3:00 am
Manchin, Sinema Join with GOP in Rejecting Attempt to Change Filibuster Rules, Effectively Killing Democratic Voting Bill MSN – Mike DeBonis (Washington Post) | Published: 1/19/2022 The year-long Democratic push for federal voting rights legislation died in the Senate after Republicans blocked an elections bill for the fifth time in six months and Democrats failed to unite their caucus behind a plan to rewrite the chamber’s rules and pass it anyway. [read post]
14 Jan 2022, 11:59 am
§ 1752) that are not included in the United States v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 1:30 pm
Let me share just one more observation for now: Apple tries hard to distinguish its case from HTC v. [read post]
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization: The Supreme Court Is No Safe Haven for Abortion Rights
9 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
(Those procedures were just declared unconstitutional in a parallel state court case, Van Stean v. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 2:59 pm
” The director defendants are “similarly liable” because they “failed to conduct direct oversight even though they were informed of the Company’s increasing antitrust liabilities, first in Europe and now in the United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2021, 1:50 pm
De Cortes v. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 5:29 pm
See, Dewalt v. [read post]
22 Nov 2021, 3:00 am
The case and the Court’s summary is as follows: County of Butte v. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 11:54 am
See ADT L.L.C. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2021, 1:58 pm
United States. [read post]
5 Oct 2021, 8:21 am
(HERE).The Conference brought together some of the most important and influential thinkers about the fundamentals of law in general, and that of the United States in particular. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 3:57 pm
The first case is Mississippi v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 12:26 am
On 2 September 2021, Judge Leonie M Brinkema in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (‘EDVA’) rejected Dr Stephen Thaler’s appeal against the USPTO’s decision to refuse two patent applications on the basis that DABUS is not a human being and therefore cannot be an inventor under US law (Stephen Thaler v Andrew Hirshfeld and the US Patent and Trademark Office, Mem. [read post]
