Search for: "Stamps v. State"
Results 61 - 80
of 1,838
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
9 Jun 2023, 12:30 pm
Regular readers of Short Circuit will remember that the Fifth Circuit made quite a stir when it held, in Jarkesy v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 12:22 am
In addition to the Illinois patients, there are patients in other states, but the Illinois officials did not report what states are involved. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:25 am
Moore v. [read post]
6 Jun 2023, 6:38 pm
Food stamp fraud is a felony in roughly 40 states. [read post]
29 May 2023, 6:20 pm
The Biden Administration is salivating at the prospect of United States v. [read post]
[Eugene Volokh] A Lawyer's Filing "Is Replete with Citations to Non-Existent Cases"—Thanks, ChatGPT?
26 May 2023, 10:46 pm
He further states that the docket number appearing on the "opinion" furnished by plaintiff's counsel, Docket No. 18-13694, is for a case captioned George Cornea v. [read post]
A “Strong Likelihood” of Change: Sixth Circuit Joins the Fifth in Raising the FLSA Certification Bar
22 May 2023, 9:53 am
In 1989, in the seminal Hoffmann-La Roche, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:01 am
More on that in Part V tomorrow, plus some big picture thoughts. [read post]
15 May 2023, 1:58 pm
In Kodiak Building Partners, LLC v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:01 am
Some are kind of quirky these days (stamp collecting?) [read post]
14 May 2023, 9:00 pm
(That essay also explains the math that we used to derive the 40,100 percent interest rate stated above.)Our overall bottom line does not change, however, because the fundamental objection to all of the gimmicks has less to do with the exact interaction of the words of the key statutes than it does with a fundamental principle of statutory interpretation. [read post]
10 May 2023, 4:00 am
Periodically on Thursdays, we present a significant excerpt, usually from a recently published book or journal article. [read post]
3 May 2023, 4:28 am
Those defendants specifically argue that the notice of claim was “stamped received by personal service on November 8, 2017 at 4: 15 p.m. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 9:05 pm
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:46 pm
Found. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 8:00 am
Even after the Court’s twisted opinion in Supreme Beef v. [read post]
24 Apr 2023, 12:36 pm
The case is People v. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 8:09 am
Today, in Reed v. [read post]
