Search for: "Standard Oil Co. of California v. California"
Results 241 - 260
of 260
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2008, 10:00 pm
State of California, 72 Cal. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:00 pm
Lazy Oil Co. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 4:50 am
Pacific Co. v Arizona (1945) demonstrates that state laws might violate the Commerce Clause even when in-state and out-of-state commerce are treated equally. [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
, Schering-Plough Corp – Following dispute over trade dress with Schering-Plough, Fruit of the Earth announces plan to change its package design: (IP Law360), US: Quanta and its impact on biotechnology: (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog), US: BIO files amicus brief asking CAFC to cabin in scope of KSR and hold that its obvious to try dicta does not abrogate the Deuel standard: In re Kubin: (Patently-O), US: StemCells gets patent on enriched central nervous system stem cell and… [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:46 pm
Sun Oil Co. (1943), federal courts should abstain from resolving a constitutional challenge to South Carolina's anti-gambling laws. [read post]
6 May 2008, 6:00 am
Thrifty Oil Co. (2000) 23 Cal.4th 429, 434), the class action not only benefits the individual litigant but serves the public interest in the enforcement of legal rights and statutory sanctions. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:00 am
Landmark IP implications for universities: University of Western Australia v Gray: (IPRoo), (Managing Intellectual Property), (The Age), The latest edition of US Trade Representative’s ‘Special 301 Report’: (Ars Technica), (Ars Technica), (IAM), (Intellectual Property Watch), (Patry Copyright Blog), (Managing Intellectual Property), (Patent Docs), (IP Law360), Court rejects RIAA ‘making available’ theory: Atlantic v Howell:… [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 11:51 am
U.S. 1st Circuit Court of Appeals, April 10, 2008 Esso Standard Oil Co. v. [read post]
14 Apr 2008, 8:54 am
Standard Oil Co. of California, 405 U.S. 251 (1972) (holding that Clayton Act does not confer standing for general economic harm), the Court observed that the relevant language of the Connecticut Antitrust Act differed from the Clayton Act. [read post]
29 Feb 2008, 8:00 am
– Teva’s opposition proceedings regarding IL 130424 to Pfizer: (IP Factor), Thailand: Thai chief drug price negotiator removed from post: (GenericsWeb), Thailand: Compulsory licences cannot be revoked: (Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), (more from Generic Pharmaceuticals & IP), UK: Court of Appeal for England and Wales hands down decision in Boehringer Ingelheim KG and Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma KG v Swingward Limited relating to repackaging and… [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
: (IP ThinkTank),IBM patents and defensive publishing: (Securing Innovation),Stockholm Network paper on developing nations and pharmaceutical patents: (IPcentral Weblog),Good and bad news for the IP industry if recession does bite: (IAM),Business Software Alliance: Piracy economic impact is tens of billions of dollars: (Ars Technica),IP portfolio costs - when less is more: (IP ThinkTank),IP protection: Competitive market default: (The Fire… [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 9:14 am
BE&K Construction Co. v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 10:14 pm
., v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 10:16 am
Amoco Oil Co., 776 N.E.2d 151, 163-64 (Ill. 2002); Weinberg v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
Standard Oil of California, 332 U.S. 301, 314 (1947). [read post]
9 Apr 2007, 6:00 am
Thrifty Oil Co., 23 Cal.4th 429 (2000). [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 2:15 pm
See, e.g., National Steel & Shipbuilding Co. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2007, 10:48 am
Kelly (1976) 17 Cal.3d 24, the California Supreme Court adopted the standard set forth in the District of Columbia Circuit's decision in Frye v. [read post]
7 Nov 2006, 4:00 pm
Union Oil had told the California Air Resources Board that the technology for production of the new standard was non-proprietary, but had then asserted its patents to force all refiners to use Union Oil's methods. [read post]
18 Oct 2006, 5:26 pm
" Michigan Wisconsin Pipe Line Co., 194 NLRB 569, 470 (1971), et al. [read post]
