Search for: "Standard Oil Co. v. State Board of Equal." Results 41 - 60 of 71
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Sep 2014, 3:29 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Employers using or considering using health risk assessments or other wellness programs should carefully monitor a new Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) lawsuit, EEOC v. [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:00 am by Administrator
Nette.[67] The case involved the rephrasing of the standard of causation for culpable homicide set out in R. v. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 8:27 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Ct. 1800 (2018) – Decided on June 11, 2018, in this class action case the Supreme Court examined whether the tolling rule for class actions established in American Pipe & Construction Co. v. [read post]
The State Water Resources Control Board Releases Proposed Rule Modifying The General Permit For Suction Dredge Miners. [read post]
7 Feb 2008, 10:46 am
Such claims are not "parallel" to any recognized FDA standard. [read post]
16 Mar 2020, 1:54 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Although the Lorenzo decision was rendered in the context of an SEC enforcement proceeding, its rationale conceivably could be read by some courts to apply with equal force in private litigation. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 12:04 pm by Edith Roberts
Gruender first examined the standard for determining whether the preliminary injunction was warranted, concluding that because Planned Parenthood “sought to enjoin the implementation of a duly enacted state statute,” thereby attempting to “thwart a state’s presumptively reasonable democratic processes,” it was required to demonstrate a “likelihood of success on the merits” rather than merely a ‘fair chance of prevailing. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm by Steven M. Taber
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
12 Jan 2017, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States, 16-309). [read post]
  In these joined cases, the Court took the opportunity to re-write the penalties doctrine, which had not been considered by the House of Lords or Supreme Court since the 1914 case of Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co Ltd v New Garage & Motor Co Ltd [1914] UKHL 1. [read post]
22 Oct 2011, 6:25 am
Furthermore, because the law applied equally to all candidates and did not result in unequal treatment, the court held that the statute did not violate the Equal Protection Clause. [read post]
Third, we explain why existing disclosures in this area provide support for, rather than reason to oppose, standardized, mandatory climate-related disclosures. [read post]