Search for: "Standard Parking, L.P."
Results 21 - 40
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Sep 2018, 9:50 am
CASH BIZ, L.P. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 7:47 am
Cherokee Meadows, L.P. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 6:09 pm
The Supremes concluded that the payday lender’s conduct, which the Court described as “providing information to the district attorney that checks written to the lender by the borrowers had been returned for insufficient funds,” did not amount to a substantial invocation of the litigation process so as the entail a waiver of the right to arbitrate under the arbitration agreement that they had forced upon the borrowers as part of the standard terms. [read post]
24 Mar 2018, 7:35 am
Johnson v. 1082 El Camino Real, L.P. [read post]
8 Oct 2017, 10:12 am
Texas Supreme Court to hear oral argument on Tuesday, October 10, 2017 in client's fee fight with his former attorney following conclusion of drawn-out fight over inheritance money. [read post]
14 Sep 2017, 1:33 pm
Cash Biz L.P., et al. [read post]
10 Sep 2017, 3:07 pm
PARK, DRUMMOND WOODSUM.TURNSTILE CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, Defendant, represented by BRIAN D. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 11:59 am
Highland Park, Inc. (1978). [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 11:33 am
., L.P., 194 B.R. 59, 64 (Bankr. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 12:11 pm
” Eldred, 537 U.S. at 219; see also Park ‘N Fly, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Jul 2016, 4:55 pm
Properties, L.P., , 2016 WL 3419299, (S.D. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 10:25 am
Grocery Company, L.P., Relator was a mandamus proceeding. [read post]
10 Dec 2015, 2:00 am
EME Homer City Generation, L.P., v. [read post]
9 Nov 2015, 7:09 am
App. 1995) (approving Restatement §500 as standard applicable to punitive damages); cf. [read post]
26 Oct 2015, 3:24 pm
City of Monterey Park (2012) 210 Cal.App.4th 394 [voter-approved ballot measure was funding mechanism or fiscal activity, not commitment to specific project with potential environmental impacts]; Cedar Fair, L.P. v. [read post]
23 Aug 2015, 2:42 pm
Brunswick Associates, L.P., wherein the panel stated that, in order to meet the “excusable neglect” standard, a litigant must show that both it and its lawyer’s actions fit into the excusable neglect category. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 12:58 pm
The court of appeal reversed the trial court’s judgment, holding that the appropriate legal standard by which the ordinance’s validity should be judged is the ordinary standard applicable to a municipality’s exercise of the police power to regulate land use. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
We’ve already discussed the peculiar decision in Watts v. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
Then I think L.P. [read post]
13 Feb 2015, 1:21 pm
Then I think L.P. [read post]
