Search for: "Stanford v. Paris" Results 1 - 20 of 46
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2021, 6:29 pm
– Megan Ma (Sciences Po/Stanford University)Discussant: Gregory Lewkowicz (ULB)Paper: Catala: Moving Towards the Future of Legal Expert Systems, Denis Merigoux (INRIA), Liane Huttner (Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne)Discussant: Rajaa el Hamdani (Télécom Paris)Paper: Ant, an annotation software for RegTech, Raphaël Gyori (ULB)Discussant: Damien Charlotin (AI Reporter/ University of Cambridge)Lunch –11.45am –… [read post]
10 Nov 2017, 9:30 pm by Dan Ernst
Herbin-Triant (University of Massachusetts Lowell) marks the 100th anniversary of the Supreme Court’s decision in Buchanan v. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 12:00 pm by Karen Tani
Here are some highlights:Thursday, April 11Plenary Session: Freedom Struggles Chair: Matthew Countryman, University of Michigan Clayborne Carson, Stanford University Barbara Ransby, University of Illinois at Chicago  Tera W. [read post]
13 May 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Stanford’s Cyberlaw blog has an article considering who owns the copyright subsisting in art created by artificial intelligence. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
Zimmer and Halo Electronics v. [read post]
19 Jul 2019, 7:28 am
| Conversant v LG: No FRAND rate in sight, as the Paris Cour d'appel tackles essentiality and German trade secrets | Does a “Launch At Risk” Automatically Exclude the Right to Appropriate Compensation for a Wrongfully-Issued Preliminary Injunction? [read post]
25 Feb 2013, 6:23 am by INFORRM
European Initiative for Media Pluralism: The ABC On Twitter: @USCMediaLaw, media law resources for the University of Southern California Law course, Media Law in the Digital Age (via Media Law Prof Blog) Past event resource – “Copyright in the Digital Age”, 16th annual Stanford Technology Law Review symposium [22 February 2013] Call for papers: 3rd Global Conference on Transparency Research, HEC Paris Paris, France, 24 October, 2013 – 26 October,… [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 1:11 am by Kelly
Becton-Dickinson (Patent Docs) US government intervenes in patentability of genes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Holman’s Biotech IP Blog) (Intellectual Property Law Blog) (Inovia) (BlawgIT) (IP Osgoode) US: BIO and AUTM fire back at gene patent foes – AMP v USPTO (Patent Baristas) (Patent Docs) US: IPO files amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) (Patent Baristas) US: AIPLA submits amicus brief in AMP v USPTO (Patent Docs) US: Summary of… [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 8:41 am by Dennis Crouch
by Dennis Crouch The first rounds of merits briefs have now been submitted to the Supreme Court in Impression Prods. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2015, 2:56 pm
Lemley (Stanford Law School) Lawrence Lessig (Harvard Law School) Raizel Liebeler (John Marshall Law School) Barry P. [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 3:00 am
(credit) Previous entries on this site have covered the Alien Tort Statute, as well as Kiobel v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 3:13 am by New Books Script
Stanford, California : Stanford Law Books, an imprint of Stanford University Press, 2012 208 pages ; 24 cm. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:46 am by Rebecca Tushnet
What’s the relevance of the economist v. legal scholars? [read post]
6 May 2013, 5:38 am by INFORRM
There were a handful of resolved cases reported:  Full Fact v The Sun, Clause 1, 06/05/2013; Mr David Murray v Sutton Guardian, Clause 1, 03/05/2013; A woman v The Sun on Sunday, Clause 9, 03/05/2013; and Dr Carol Uren v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 03/05/2013. [read post]
18 Aug 2009, 1:35 pm
Waller that a client who was in pari delicto with his lawyer could not pursue a claim for legal malpractice. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm by Alana Bevan
Last term, the Supreme Court voted 5-3 against reviving the nondelegation doctrine in Gundy v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
United States Stanford’s Cyberlaw Blog has considered how the FTC can help safeguard privacy rights with legislative mandates from Congress. [read post]