Search for: "Stanford v. The State Bar of California"
Results 61 - 80
of 160
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2018, 2:50 am
Marshall won 29 out of 32 cases he argued in front of the high court, including Brown v. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 4:24 pm
The initial reaction of the plaintiffs’ bar was to move to state court. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm
A short but insightful essay by Stanford Law Professor Pamela Karlan in the California Law Review anticipated that question five years before the Supreme Court decided Obergefell. [read post]
18 Mar 2018, 5:08 pm
The Standford Cyberlaw blog has noted California’s legislative attempts to safeguard net neutrality rules in two posts. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 4:49 pm
Union of India [pdf], where the Indian Supreme Court ruled that political candidates and relatives right to privacy bars disclosure of their source of income. [read post]
4 Sep 2017, 2:20 pm
The likeliest explanation is that increased levels of securities suit filings reflect changes in the plaintiffs’ securities class action bar. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 11:44 am
Chase believed the 14th Amendment barred such discrimination by a state. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
Superior Court of California, San Francisco County, the justices reversed a state court finding of specific personal jurisdiction over out-of-state plaintiffs in a multistate lawsuit. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
—Humberto Morales Moreno, Universidad Autonoma de Puebla Author Meets Reader: Carol Steiker & Jordan Steiker, Courting Death: The Supreme Court and Capital PunishmentTue, 6/20: 12:45 PM - 2:30 PM – Sheraton Maria Isabel Imperio C (2nd Floor) · Authors—Carol Steiker, Harvard Law School and Jordan Steiker, University of Texas School of Law · … [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 4:23 am
” At Stanford Law School’s Legal Aggregate blog, Lisa Larrimore Ouellette looks at the court’s decision inTC Heartland LLC v. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 1:13 pm
Susan Athey (now Stanford Business School, but in 2009 she was helping Microsoft attack Google on antitrust matters), Dr. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Early on, however, the American bench and Bar seemed to reach an uneasy stalemate about the contours of the debate regarding corporate social responsibility. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 3:39 pm
” (To support the nationwide injunction, Washington argued that immigration law had to be uniform; ironically, the state had opposed this exact argument in United States v. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 12:54 pm
Supreme Court ruling Hurst v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 10:44 am
According to an interview she gave to an American Bar Association journal, Ms. [read post]
31 Jan 2016, 5:39 pm
In Whyte v. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:03 am
United States, 730 F.2d 1465, 1468 (Fed. [read post]
20 Jul 2015, 8:01 am
Rule 16(a)(6) is a catchall clause that requires the government to “[a]dvise the defendant’s attorney of evidence favorable to the defendant and material to the defendant’s guilt or punishment to which defendant is entitled pursuant to Brady and United States v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
In Glossip v. [read post]
10 Jun 2015, 8:55 am
Elizabeth Magill for a conversation at a Stanford Connects alumni event in Sacramento. [read post]
