Search for: "Stanley v. City of Independence" Results 1 - 20 of 60
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Mar 2024, 5:59 am by Unknown
Those disclosure failures meant that the minority stockholders were not adequately informed, and that the transaction was not eligible for the safe harbor of the MFW framework (City of Dearborn Police and Fire Revised Retirement System (Chapter 23) v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 3:26 am by Laura Sandwell, Matrix.
On Wednesday 21 March 2012 the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in the following: Flood v Times Newspapers Ltd, R (ST) v SoS for the Home Department and Tesco Stores Ltd v Dundee City Council. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am by Conor McEvily
”  And writing for the Opinionator blog of the New York Times, Stanley Fish discusses the decisions in Bennett and Brown v. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 11:16 am
City of New London, Conn. (2005) -- held that the city's taking of private property to sell for private development qualified as a "public use" within the meaning of the takings clause where the city was following an economic development plan.Hamdan v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am by NFS Esq.
The collateral source rule, which precludes deduction of compensation the plaintiff has received from sources independent of the tortfeasor from damages the plaintiff “would otherwise collect from the tortfeasor” (Helfend v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 5:11 pm
PAUL, STANLEY MCMILLER, SEAN PALMER; from Wichita County; 2nd district (02-06-00348-CV, ___ SW3d ___, 01-31-08)08-0343STANLEY V. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 7:36 pm by Francis Pileggi
 City of Miami General Employees’ & Sanitation Employees’ Retirement Trust v. [read post]
29 Sep 2013, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
  Judgment was given by Deemster Roberts on 24 September 2013 (Stanley v Morris, Case Ref 2012/1551). [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 8:18 pm by Thaddeus Hoffmeister
Supreme Court of State of Washington Strengthens Batson On July 6, 2017, the Supreme Court of the State of Washington rendered an opinion in City of Seattle v. [read post]