Search for: "Stanton v Kelley" Results 1 - 6 of 6
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Sep 2023, 5:29 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
In his opposition affidavit, David states that he has no recollection of receiving it, and Singer’s claim that the letter was mailed does not give rise to the presumption of receipt, as he does not present evidence of defendant firm’s office practices pertinent to mailing (see Lindsay v Pasternack Tilker Ziegler Walsh Stanton & Romano LLP, 129 AD3d 790, 793 [2d Dept 2015]; Morrison Cohen Singer & Weinstein, LLP v Brophy, 19 AD3d 161, 162 [1 st Dept… [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 2:43 pm by Pace Law School Library
 Introduction by Paul Stanton Kibel and student Angela Haren Kelley;articles by Rebecca M. [read post]