Search for: "Stanton v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals"
Results 1 - 10
of 10
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Mar 2014, 11:24 am
The net effect was that YouTube benefited from the safe harbor provisions.On appeal, the Court agreed with Judge Stanton’s interpretation of the knowledge requirement stating that under Section 512(c)(1)(A) knowledge alone will not disqualify a service provider from the safe harbour protection. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 7:29 pm
See Columbia v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 8:17 am
As the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and other courts have held, "when a mistrial is declared with the consent of the defendant or upon his motion, it is 'ordinarily assumed to remove any barrier to reprosecution, even if the defendant's motion is necessitated by prosecutorial or judicial error.'” Lee-Thomas v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 6:29 am
As readers may recall, the Court of Appeals agreed. [read post]
16 Jun 2018, 7:30 am
District Court judge allowed the “kill list” lawsuit to move forward with its challenge of the targeted killing program. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 6:16 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and then the Supreme Court, she penned scores of opinions and dissents both forgettable and epochal. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 8:56 pm
Opinion below (7th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply __________________ Docket: 07-1366 Case name: Stanton, et al. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 4:18 am
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, which covers Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana. [read post]
12 Dec 2010, 1:35 pm
Unfortunately for the defendant, a confidential settlement was reached prior to the ruling being filed.[15] It is unclear whether the ruling would have been appealed by Righthaven, and what the ultimate court decision would have been on this issue. [read post]
23 Aug 2008, 1:23 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included: DRM for streaming music dies a quiet death: (Electronic Frontier Foundation), (Techdirt) CAFC decides Apotex and Impax infringed AstraZeneca’s Prilosec patents: (Law360), (Patent Prospector), (Patent Docs), (GenericsWeb), CAFC upholds lower court’s decision finding USPTO was within its rights to subject a Cooper… [read post]
