Search for: "Staples v. United States"
Results 181 - 200
of 238
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jun 2022, 12:58 am
And finally…I In that rather esoteric common law jurisdiction known as the United States of America, the US 6th Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the lower court’s decision that the Universal Life Church has standing to pursue its challenge to a Tennessee law prohibiting persons who have been ordained online from solemnizing marriages: Universal Life Church Monastery Storehouse v Nabors (6th Cir, May 27, 2022). [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
As I said at the outset of the Zoom gathering—and on other Levinsonfests as well—I very much feel described by the old Sesame Street staple, “Which of these things (or persons) does not belong with the other? [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 5:01 am
Hardison, 432 US 63, 84 (1977). [2] See, e.g., EEOC v. [read post]
13 Sep 2022, 6:30 am
I think it is somewhat telling that Jennifer’s caution leads her to try to ask if there are any real defenses for what I find one of the truly indefensible features of the Constitution—the allocation in the Senate of equal voting power by states. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 12:49 am
The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
1 May 2011, 12:00 am
The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
3 May 2011, 10:30 pm
The common law has developed a law of privacy without a Human Rights Act in New Zealand, some Australian states and parts of Canada. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 4:17 am
Indeed, we have previously recognized that administrative searches are not rendered invalid because they are accompanied by some degree of suspicion, see Bruce, 498 F.3d at 1242, and the Supreme Court has similarly noted that suspicion of criminal activity will not defeat an otherwise permissible administrative search, see United States v. [read post]
5 Dec 2017, 12:01 pm
McIntosh, Civil Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., for amicus United States. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 2:01 am
The closures are distributed across eight different states. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 5:51 pm
To begin with, the A.G. had two databases about mass shootings in the United States. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 4:20 pm
It invokes the notorious e-mails from the Climate Research Unit at the University of East Anglia – a staple for any climate sceptic – for which see my post on a recent round of “sceptics against UEA” and on the background to that dispute. [read post]
4 Dec 2007, 9:20 am
UPDATE: The California Supreme Court's decision in Rico v. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 5:21 am
Part V concludes. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 7:20 am
United States v. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:15 am
Boston Scientific Corp., 433 F.3d 1, 5 (1st Cir. 2006)(holding that SOX has no application to employees outside the United States). [read post]
22 May 2016, 8:47 am
In Hickey v. [read post]
20 Sep 2007, 1:12 am
In one case, Riegel v. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 6:07 pm
Don’t attach the payment to your return using staples or paper clips. [read post]
9 Apr 2009, 9:27 am
(Promote the Progress) N D Illinois one step closer to adopting patent rules (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) Innovate Texas Foundation launched to accelerate state’s IP commercialisation (Technology Transfer Tactics) Special Masters a [read post]
