Search for: "Staples v. United States" Results 61 - 80 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Aug 2012, 12:01 pm by royblack
United States: “Great cases like hard cases make bad law. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 2:05 pm by Harvard Law Review
Criminal Law - Supervised Release - Third Circuit Approves Decade-Long Internet Ban for Sex Offender - United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Leon Friedman
  His persistence would change the face of criminal justice in the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2020, 10:14 am by Geraldine Davila Gonzalez
On September 29, 2020, in the case of Bookfinders Ltd v The Revenue Commissioners, the Irish Supreme Court held, among other issues, that the bread used in Subway sandwiches did not fall within the definition of bread as a staple food under Irish tax laws due to a high percentage of sugar and fat in the ingredients and was thus not subject to the zero percent tax rate. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 8:47 pm
  My infatuation began with Judge Evans' opinion in United States v. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:31 am by Alistair Simmons
” This interpretation is derived from the definition of a machinegun in Staples v. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:49 pm by Lawrence Solum
Here is the abstract: Political process theory, closely associated with the work of John Hart Ely and footnote four in United States v. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 6:08 pm by Carrie Cordero, Quinta Jurecic
” Apart from a tiny handful of scholars or policy professionals—including, apparently, former National Security Council spokesman Michael Anton—the vast majority of the legal academy agrees that the language of the Fourteenth Amendment ensures birthright citizenship, a principle affirmed in the Supreme Court’s 1898 ruling in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 6:28 am
§ 271(f), which creates liability for anyone who supplies from the United States one or more components of a patented invention"where such components are uncombined in whole or in part, in such manner as toactively induce the combination of such components outside of the United States in a manner that would infringe the patent if such combination occurred within the United States. [read post]