Search for: "Staples v. United States" Results 121 - 140 of 237
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Feb 2020, 6:22 am by Robert Chesney
The ability to legislate to protect public health has always been a staple of state government authority (the classic understanding of the “police powers” belonging to the states is a formulation that expressly references protection of public health, among other things). [read post]
4 Aug 2015, 3:28 pm by Danny O'Brien
Anything less would be a violation of the United States' First Amendment. [read post]
17 Oct 2022, 12:25 pm by William Appleton
Václav Bartuška, the Czech ambassador-at-large for Energy Security.. [read post]
22 Aug 2009, 12:56 am
United States, 37 U.S. 488, 492 (1838). [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 5:14 pm by Christa Culver
Arizona; (2) whether the interviewer’s state of mind has any bearing on whether a suspect's statement is voluntary under the established law of Oregon v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 2:36 pm
  On the Assistant United States Attorney witness list is "lay" witness, Kimbery Bell, The King's ex-paramour. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:33 am by Ranchod Law Group
How to Write an I601 Extreme Hardship Waiver Argument If you’ve been found inadmissible to the United States or to adjust your status due to certain immigration violations, you may be eligible to apply for an I601 Waiver of Grounds of Inadmissibility. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 6:20 pm by Derek Bambauer
Jane wrote an amicus brief in IMS v. [read post]
19 Nov 2012, 3:48 pm
Last week, I focused on how the United States' unreasonably high corporate taxes can hinder American companies' global competitiveness, and Hostess Brands' monthly operating report (required for bankruptcy proceedings) shows at page 15 that the beleaguered company was/is responsible for not only state, local and federal corporate income taxes, but also millions of dollars in other taxes, including (i) Federal Insurance Contributions Act (FICA); (ii) Federal Unemployment… [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 1:29 am
That section provides: Whoever offers to sell or sells within the United States or imports into the United States a component of a patented machine, manufacture, combination or composition, or a material or apparatus for use in practicing a patented process, constituting a material part of the invention, knowing the same to be especially made or especially adapted for use in an infringement of such patent, and not a staple article or commodity of… [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm by Brian Pascal
The vast majority of Americans possess mobile phones, they are staples of popular culture, and both Justice Roberts, in this case, and Justice Sotomayor, in her concurrence in U.S. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 12:35 pm by Brian Pascal
The vast majority of Americans possess mobile phones, they are staples of popular culture, and both Justice Roberts, in this case, and Justice Sotomayor, in her concurrence in U.S. v. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 5:46 pm by Michael M. O'Hear
The court relies almost entirely on statutory interpretation cases from the United States Supreme Court. [read post]