Search for: "Starbucks Corp. v. Wolfe's Borough Coffee, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 29
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2008, 9:38 pm
Wolfe's Borough Coffee, Inc., Case No. 01 Civ. 5981, 2008 U.S. [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 6:13 am
Wolfe's Borough Coffee, Inc., 2011 WL 6747431 (S.D.N.Y.) [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 3:54 am
On June 5, the Southern District of New York decided that Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 5:29 am
Wolfe's Borough Coffee, Inc. can be found here. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 2:47 pm
Wolfe's Borough Coffee, Inc., --- F.3d ----, 2009 WL 4349537 (2nd Cir.) [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 7:06 am
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., Civil Action No.: 01-Civ-5981 (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (“Starbucks V”) concluding that Starbucks failed to prove that the defendant’s use of the marks MISTER CHARBUCKS and CHARBUCKS BLEND is likely to dilute Starbucks’s famous marks including, of course,… [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 12:00 am
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., the U.S. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:01 pm
Wolfe's Borough Coffee, Inc., No. 06-0435 (2d Cir. [read post]
1 Mar 2007, 9:22 pm
The Second Circuit has vacated the Southern District of New York’s dismissal of Starbucks Corp.’s dilution claim against Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 3:16 pm
Wolfe's Borough Coffee, Inc., No. 08-3331-cv (Dec. 3, 2009), the Second Circuit found that the district court erred in ruling against Starbucks on the FTDA claim when it held that the "similarity" factor in the FTDA claim requires that the accused mark be "substantially similar. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 2:21 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., No. 12‐364‐cv (2d Cir. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 9:07 am
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc.) involving trademark infringement and its genetic freak of a cousin: trademark dilution. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 3:53 am
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., a Second Circuit case still fresh on my mind from my Trademark Law class. [read post]
11 Feb 2008, 9:05 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., 477 F.3d 765, 766 (2d Cir. 2007) (STL post here), had applied the TDRA retroactively. [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 8:35 pm
(STL discussion of Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2007, 12:10 am
Wolfe's Borough Coffee Inc. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 7:40 pm
Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, Inc., __ F.3d. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 8:00 am
Abercrombie & Fitch Trading Co., the Ninth Circuit, like the Second Circuit in Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:48 pm
In the first appellate decision to touch on the TDRA, Starbucks Corp. v. [read post]
