Search for: "Stark County v. State"
Results 21 - 40
of 282
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2023, 5:31 am
Last week's Supreme Court decision in Health & Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. [read post]
8 Jun 2023, 2:30 pm
The post Justice Thomas's Dissent in Health and Hospital Corp. of Marion County v. [read post]
7 Jun 2023, 4:20 pm
On Tuesday, in Nuziard v. [read post]
23 May 2023, 12:58 am
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) has reprimanded Plymouth City Council and Norfolk County Council for failing to respond to the public when asked for personal information held about them – known as a Subject Access Request (SAR). [read post]
12 Mar 2023, 9:31 am
EFF appealed the case before the state's transparency board, which eventually forced Escobedo to release a slideshow and receipts showing the city had wasted more than 4 million pesos on the Sistema de Predicción de Delitos (SPRED) project. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 9:50 am
Supreme Court case Brady v. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 6:30 am
Consider the now infamous case, United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2022, 12:05 pm
Maricopa County Comm. [read post]
20 Jun 2022, 2:04 pm
The Supreme Court has described this element in stark terms. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 1:03 pm
Despite this seemingly similar language, however, a stark distinction has emerged between the two. [read post]
4 Mar 2022, 3:56 am
John Doe, born female and transitioning to male, says Detective Adam Gray of the Starke County Sheriff’s Department disclosed John Doe’s gender identity to A.B., his [wife] who was allegedly unaware of it. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 5:21 am
" Whalen v. [read post]
26 Feb 2022, 6:53 pm
In a seminal 1977 discrimination case, Casteneda v. [read post]
18 Feb 2022, 2:53 pm
The case is Plymouth County Retirement System v. [read post]
11 Feb 2022, 5:52 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 5:30 am
The court’s 2013 decision in Shelby County v. [read post]
19 Dec 2021, 8:16 pm
United States v. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
However, caselaw confirms that welfare is still ‘a primary consideration’ (ZH (Tanzania) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] 2 AC 166, [2011] UKSC 4), so it’s going to be a pretty important factor in any consideration of publication, and in many cases it will be determinative. [read post]
27 Nov 2021, 6:26 am
” On May 23, 2019, the mother filed a petition in the Family Court, Nassau County, for an upward modification of the father’s child support obligation pursuant to the terms of the judgment of divorce. [read post]
19 Nov 2021, 12:30 pm
(We recently marked the 50th anniversary of Younger v. [read post]
