Search for: "Starr v. Smith et al" Results 1 - 5 of 5
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Apr 2024, 3:59 pm by Michael C. Dorf
So too during the oral argument: Justices Thomas, Alito, et al made so many spurious arguments that attempting to deal with them one by one feels like a sucker's game.Just to name a few lowlights:*    Justice Thomas wanted to know whether he could use this case to invalidate Jack Smith's appointment. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:58 am
Walgreens et al (CAFC 2009-1237) precedential Judge DYK penned this opinion, with which Judge Bryson concurred. [read post]