Search for: "Starr v. City and County of San Francisco" Results 1 - 20 of 73
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Second District Holds Ventura County’s Adoption of Ordinance Creating Wildlife Migration Corridor Overlay Zones In County’s Rural Areas Did Not Violate SMARA And Was Properly Determined Categorically Exempt From CEQA
16 Nov 2023, 12:24 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2013) 222 Cal.App.4th 863; Save the Plastic Bag Coalition v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Missing the Forest For the Trees: First District Reverses Trial Court, Upholds Project Description And Impact Analysis In Regents’ EIR For Vegetation Removal Projects To Reduce Wildfire Risk At UC Berkeley Hills Campus
20 Jun 2023, 8:42 am by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321, 329, 331.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
No Room At the Table:  Second District Upholds Denial of Intervention in CEQA/Coastal Act Litigation Where Nonparties Failed to Make “Compelling Showing of Inadequate Representation”.
15 May 2023, 11:09 am by Arthur F. Coon
(Citing City and County of San Francisco v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Slapping Down An Anti-SLAPP: First District Holds Next-Door Neighbor Opponents Of Residential Renovation Project And Related CEQA Compliance In City’s Administrative Proceedings Were Properly Named As Real Parties In Interest In Project Proponent’s Subsequent Mandate Action Challenging City’s Project Denial
12 May 2023, 4:57 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco, et al. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA Updates: Supreme Court Depublishes High School Stadium Light Standard Exemption Case; Second District Modifies Pacific Palisades Opinion With No Change In Judgment
28 Mar 2023, 1:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Reverses Judgment In Controversial “People’s Park” CEQA Case, Holds UC Regents’ Program/Project EIR For Long Range Development Plan And Site-Specific Student Housing Project At The Park Failed To Adequately Analyze Alternative Housing Sites, Noise And Displacement Impacts
3 Mar 2023, 10:24 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Make UC a Good Neighbor v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Holds Addendum To 2010 Program EIR For Irvine Business Complex Vision Plan Violated CEQA Because Conclusion That Large Infill Project’s GHG Emissions Would Be Less Than Significant Lacked Substantial Evidence And Project Was Not Exempt
21 Feb 2023, 1:21 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  IBC Business Owners for Sensible Development v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
A “Capitol” Offense: Third District Holds State Capitol Building Annex/Visitor Center Protect EIR Violated CEQA Due To Inadequate Project Description And Analyses Of Historical Cultural Impacts, Aesthetics, And Project Alternatives
2 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321, 332.) [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“Yes, San Francisco, There Is A CEQA”: First District Reverses Judgment Upholding City’s Categorical Exemption Determinations For Project To Add Four 90-Foot Tall Light Standards To High School Stadium In Residential Neighborhood
7 Dec 2022, 4:07 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2022) ___ Cal.App.5th ___. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
CEQA Mixed-Use “Mix and Match” Upheld: Second District Holds Stable Project Description Requirement Does Not Mean Ultimately Approved Version of Revised Mixed Use Project Must Match An Alternative Analyzed In EIR, And New Project Alternative Added to FEIR Does Not Require Recirculation
7 Jul 2022, 11:22 am by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321 (“SOMA”) (my 4/5/19 post on which can be found here); (4) Citizens for a Sustainable Treasure Island v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
“This Woeful Record”: First District Affirms Judgment Rejecting CEQA Challenges To Marin County’s Approval of 43-Home Mountaintop Subdivision Opposed For Nearly Five Decades By Neighbors And Town of Tiburon
23 May 2022, 10:16 am by Arthur F. Coon
On May 12, 2022, the First District Court of Appeal filed a 108-page published opinion affirming a judgment denying a CEQA writ petition that challenged Marin County’s approval of a 43-lot single-family residential subdivision on a 110-acre parcel atop a mountain overlooking the Town of Tiburon and San Francisco Bay. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Third District Rejects CEQA Challenges To El Dorado Irrigation District Ditch Piping Project, Holds EIR’s Project Description And Analysis Of Potential Hydrology, Biological Resources, and Wildfire Impacts Were Adequate
1 Mar 2022, 9:13 am by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321, 332, my April 5, 2019 post on which is found here), the Court rejected it as meritless. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Affirms Judgment Upholding Statutory CEQA Exemption For Housing Project Consistent With EIR-Reviewed Specific Plan, Rejects Claims That Changes In Project Or Circumstances Required Subsequent EIR
8 Feb 2022, 10:29 am by Arthur F. Coon
  (Citing Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Fourth District Addresses Numerous Significant CEQA Issues In Action Challenging City of San Diego’s Utility Undergrounding Projects
21 Oct 2021, 4:44 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2012) 208 Cal.App.4th 950 [my post 9/12/12 on which can be found here] and Taxpayers for Accountable School Bond Spending v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Second District Confirms Parking Is (Still) Not A CEQA Impact, Reverses Judgment That Found EIR For San Gabriel Mountains Wilderness Recreation And Preservation Project Deficient For Not Sufficiently Analyzing “Impact” Of Reducing Recreational Parking
23 Aug 2021, 8:52 am by Arthur F. Coon
City & County of San Francisco (2002) 102 Cal.App.4th 656 for the principle that the “social inconvenience of having to hunt for scarce parking spaces is not an environmental [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
First District Affirms Judgment Rejecting CEQA and General Plan Consistency Challenges to Napa County’s EIR for Syar Quarry Expansion Project, Addresses Significant Exhaustion and Land Use Issues
3 May 2021, 9:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2019) 33 Cal.App.5th 321, 329-330 (my April 5, 2019 post on which can be found here) in setting out the general CEQA principles and standards governing its review in a case challenging an EIR’s content and analysis. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Failure to Pursue and Exhaust Administrative Appeal Remedy Results In Forfeiture of CEQA Challenge To Categorical Exemption Despite Lower Body’s Defective Hearing Notice
13 Apr 2021, 10:34 am by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco (2021) 60 Cal.App.5th 470. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
Must CEQA Compliance Precede Project Approval? When State Water Board Water Quality Certifications Are Involved, The Answer Is As “Clear as Mud”
4 Mar 2021, 5:22 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  Among the fully briefed cases before it now awaiting scheduling of oral argument is County of Butte v. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
2020: A Look Back at the Year’s CEQA Case Law
18 Jan 2021, 7:58 pm by Arthur F. Coon
San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board (2020) ____ Cal.App.5th ____, and my 1/6/21 post on it can be found here. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com
A “Fare” Shake? Ninth Circuit Affirms Judgment On the Pleadings for San Francisco In Removed Action Challenging SFMTA’s 2018 Taxi Regulations, Remands for Consideration of Whether to Grant Plaintiffs Leave to Amend CEQA Claim
11 Nov 2020, 8:52 pm by Arthur F. Coon
City and County of San Francisco, et al. (9th Cir. 2020) ___ F.3d ___. [read post]
CEQA Developments - http://www.ceqadevelopments.com