Search for: "Starr v. Sony BMG"
Results 1 - 17
of 17
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
ABSTRACT: In Starr v. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 11:30 am
ABSTRACT: In Starr v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Daniel Sokol Kenneth Logan & Jonathan Youngwood (Simpson Thacher & Bartlett) discusses Starr v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
Daniel Sokol Kenneth Logan & Jonathan Youngwood (Simpson Thacher & Bartlett) discusses Starr v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
ABSTRACT: In Starr v. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
ABSTRACT: In Starr v. [read post]
13 Jan 2010, 5:30 pm
Hat tip to @cbcalvin on Twitter, and betanews:In Starr v. [read post]
17 Feb 2010, 5:37 pm
See Starr v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 8:07 pm
” Starr v. [read post]
26 Jan 2010, 4:07 am
” Starr v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:14 am
” Starr v. [read post]
17 May 2010, 7:21 am
[WLF; CPI Antitrust Journal; Loeb & Loeb; Class Action Defense blog; Starr v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 3:23 pm
Sony BMG Music Entertainment, No. 08-5637-cv, will appear at 2010-1 Trade Cases ¶76,866. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 6:03 am
Starr et al v. [read post]
6 Jun 2020, 4:59 pm
[iv] If there is no direct evidence of such an agreement, plaintiffs must show there was parallel action—where the defendants all acted in unison and the behavior “would probably not result from chance, coincidence, independent responses to common stimuli, or mere interdependence unaided by an advance understanding among the parties”[v]—and “plus factors” which show collusion. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 10:42 am
The criticism that copyright is a “monopoly” is often bandied about. [read post]
