Search for: "State v. Blight" Results 1 - 20 of 369
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2015, 2:02 pm by Cale
This whole concept promulgated into the Kelo v. [read post]
25 Jun 2010, 12:57 pm by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
Here's a round-up of reports and analysis of yesterday's opinion by the New York Court of Appeals in the "Columbia U. blight" case, Kaur v. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 12:18 pm by Lawrence Solum
New York State Urban Development Corp., and Goldstein v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 8:53 am
But most rulings aren't Kelo v. [read post]
14 Jun 2007, 2:15 pm
(SC88487, Jun. 12, 2007), clarified that state's meaning of the term "blight" as a justification for taking property by eminent domain: (1) The evidence presented was insufficient to show the social liability necessary to support a finding of blight. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 1:18 pm by Alan Ackerman
  The underlying issue will remain whether “blight” is to have any real meaning in the context of  Berman v Parker or if blight is just something a local community concludes exists for a property in order to obtain the property via the condemnation process. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm by Bill Ward
The varying approaches to this issue by different states can be seen in the New York State Court of Appeals in Kaur v. [read post]