Search for: "State v. Clay County Development Authority"
Results 1 - 18
of 18
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Sep 2016, 10:01 am
“THE INTEGRITY OF THE RESULTS HAVE BEEN CALLED INTO QUESTION” That quote is from, according to news media, a statement issued by the Clay County Sheriff’s Office. [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 3:47 am
Jaraysi v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 7:32 am
Some counties have recently worked on amending their impact fee schedules, scopes and intended uses – Clay County for instance. [read post]
2 Jun 2008, 6:18 am
Allwright, which he authored. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:51 am
"Data, data, data, I cannot make bricks without clay. [read post]
9 Jul 2020, 8:43 am
BHB Development, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
Clay v. [read post]
26 Nov 2007, 7:49 am
However, families continue to be challenged by poor mental health service coverage, difficulty with prior authorization, and navigating the system. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 9:24 am
Click Here DECISIONS Arkema, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2019, 8:36 am
Last month, the military commission for the matter of United States v. [read post]
23 Aug 2010, 1:22 pm
Landfill gas collected by the separate Middlesex County Utilities Authority (MCUA) and Edgeboro Disposal Inc. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
Click Here California Dairy Gives County a Gas Detection System, Settling Case. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
Click Here California Dairy Gives County a Gas Detection System, Settling Case. [read post]
November 30, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
30 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
Click Here California Appeals Court Affirms Lower Court Holding in Goodrich v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm
— Chris Whitley, EPA, March 22, 2010 A dairy operation in Sioux County, Iowa, has agreed to pay a $26,288 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it discharged animal waste pollutants from its facility into a tributary of the Orange City Slough without having a necessary permit. [read post]
20 Nov 2020, 9:36 pm
In Kestel v. [read post]
22 Nov 2020, 5:43 pm
He remains authorized. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm
The proposed settlement was entered into under the authority granted EPA in Section 122(h) of CERCLA, and requires the Respondents to pay $600,000.00 to the Hazardous Substances Superfund in settlement of past costs. [read post]