Search for: "State v. Poland" Results 1 - 20 of 653
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 May 2012, 1:56 am by sally
Pomiechowski v District Court of Legunica, Poland; Lukaszewski v District Court in Torun, Poland; Rozanski v Regional Court 3 Penal Department, Poland; Regina (Halligen) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2012] UKSC 20; [2012] WLR (D) 158 “When a notice of appeal against an extradition decision had an irregularity which could be cured by amendment and the circumstances merited that, the court had jurisdiction to… [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:12 am
Poland contended that the measures amounted to a fundamental alteration of the conditions of accession defined in that Act that was detrimental to the Poland. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 2:05 pm by Allard Knook
The Court reiterated that apprehension of internal difficulties in the course of implementing a decision on State aid could not justify a failure by a Member State to comply with its obligations under Community law (Case C-52/95 Commission v France [1995]; Case C-265/95 Commission v France [1997]; and Case C-441/06 Commission v France [2007]). [read post]
4 Feb 2011, 1:52 am by sally
Kasprzak v Warsaw Regional Court, Poland; Bingham v Trial Court No 4 of Marbella, Spain; Wilson-Campbell v Court of Instruction No 4 of Orihuela, Alicante, Spain [2011] EWHC 100 (Admin); [2011] WLR (D) 35 “Article 23 of the Council Framework Decision of 13 June 2002 on the European arrest warrant and the surrender procedures between member states, as implemented by s 36(3)(b) of the Extradition Act 2003, contemplated the possibility of agreement… [read post]
The Republic of Poland, the Kingdom of Denmark and the Italian Republic Friday filed declarations of intervention in the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the case of Ukraine v. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 3:36 pm by Rohini Kurup
The Supreme Court on March 3 issued a ruling in United States v. [read post]
12 Feb 2020, 12:54 pm by Thalia Kruger
  The Supreme Administrative Court stated that in accordance with the law on civil status register, the transcription must be refused if contrary to ordre public in Poland. [read post]
14 Nov 2008, 9:50 am
Zalewska v Department for Social Development House of Lords “The United Kingdom's decision to restrict the payment of welfare benefits for nationals of Poland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia, Slovakia and the Czech Republic, known collectively as the A8 states, to those who had worked an uninterrupted 12 months in employment registered with the Home Office was not incompatible with European Union law. [read post]