Search for: "State v. Sorrows" Results 1 - 20 of 131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2010, 3:56 pm by Norm Pattis
 My hope was to poke my head in on the trial of State v. [read post]
6 Mar 2011, 11:53 pm by Mac
” – Chief Justice Roberts Last Wednesday, the Supreme Court of the United States handed down its decision in Snyder v. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 5:07 am
One of the great sorrows of the English relates to their football team's fabled inability to win soccer matches when, when the scores are level at the end of extra time, go to a penalty shoot-out. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 9:00 am
While Rivera claimed that his state of intoxication negated the “knowingly” element of the crime, he apparently failed to raise that defense at the time of trial.And since nothing in the record suggested that he was “under the influence” at the time of the incident, the AD1 was of the opinion that the lower court’s verdict was consistent with the evidence.We're betting Rivera was drunk with sorrow after that decision.To… [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 5:08 am by Evidence ProfBlogger
Like Federal Rule of Evidence 704(a), Arizona Rule of Evidence 704 provides that Testimony in the form of an opinion or inference otherwise admissible is not objectionable because it embraces an ultimate issue to be decided by the trier of... [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 12:31 pm
  The California Supreme Court has led the state courts in a relentless expansion of this doctrine in the sports context, applying the doctrine to immunize defendants in a wide variety of settings. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 7:01 am by By Chase Strangio, Staff Attorney, ACLU
Then, like Edie Windsor who successfully challenged the constitutionality of the so-called Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) in United States v. [read post]