Search for: "State, Department of Industrial Relations v. Thomas" Results 1 - 20 of 284
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2016, 11:42 am by Stephen D. Rosenberg
As Nevin Adams writes on NAPA Net: As it relates to the impact of the fiduciary regulation on fixed income annuities (FIA), the filing notes that in the Labor Department’s NOPR, both declared rate fixed annuities and FIAs were included in PTE 84-24, but that “without adequate notice as required under the APA, in the final Rule the Department moved FIAs out of PTE 84-24 and into the BICE. [read post]
7 Mar 2014, 1:34 am by Dr Jeremias Prassl
‘Exposing a Grave Injustice’: Montreal Exclusivity and the Rights of Disabled Passengers On March 5, 2014 the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in Stott v Thomas Cook (previewed for the UK Supreme Court blog last autumn here). [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:31 am by Daniel M. Kowalski
This is recognized in the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) at 9 FAM § 402.1-3 , which states that an “applicant desiring to come to the United States for one principal purpose, and one or more incidental purposes, must be classified in accordance with the principal purpose. [read post]
12 Jan 2021, 10:19 am by Jeremy Gordon
The Supreme Court’s decision in Simon may be affected by its resolution of a related case, Federal Republic of Germany v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am by Dan Carvajal
Illinois Department of Revenue (1967) and Quill Corp. v. [read post]
1 May 2009, 3:48 am
EEO/iNews = News Related to Equal Employment OpportunitySource: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 11:06 am by Unknown
United States Department of Interior (Gaming - Tribal Service Area)Gibbs v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:00 am by Gene Quinn
UPDATED: June 21, 2010 at 11:55 am Straight from the Broken Record department, the United States Supreme Court has again not issued a decision in Bilski v. [read post]
22 Apr 2015, 4:30 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
The settlement resolves a FLSA lawsuit brought by the Labor Department Wage & Hour Division against four related contractors in Perez v. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 12:02 pm
That opinion was joined by seven Justices - Justice Scalia (who wrote it), along with the Chief Justice and Justices Kennedy, Souter, Thomas, Breyer, and Alito.Yesterday in Wyeth v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 10:38 am by Holly Brezee
However, in June 2021, Justice Clarence Thomas, writing in a denial of certiorari in Standing Akimbo LLC v. [read post]
5 May 2016, 7:45 am by Laura Donohue
The controversy over the Second Bank of the United States, ostensibly settled in McCullough v. [read post]
9 Jun 2014, 5:32 pm by INFORRM
I assume Michael filed his motion under §27.003(a) of the TCPA, which states that “[i]f a legal action is based on, relates to, or is in response to a party’s exercise of the right of free speech, right to petition, or right of association, that party may file a motion to dismiss the legal action. [read post]