Search for: "State, Etc. v. First Judicial Dist. Court, Etc." Results 1 - 20 of 68
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2019, 2:13 pm by admin
Jeffries Homes Housing Project, 306 Mich 638, 647-48; 11 NW2d 272 (1943); Grand Rapids Bd of Ed v Baczewski, 340 Mich 265, 270-71; 65 NW2d 810 (1954); Dep’t of Conservation v Connor, 316 Mich 565, 576-78; 25 NW2d 619 (1947). 9  See Chicago, Detroit, etc v Jacobs, 225 Mich 677; 196 NW 621 (1924); Michigan Air Line Ry v Barnes, 44 Mich 222; 6 NW 651 (1880); Toledo, etc R Co v Dunlap, 47 Mich 456; 11 NW 271 (1882); Detroit,… [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
Thinking about yesterday's decision in Melendez-Diaz led me to think about last week's decision in District Attorney's Office for Third Judicial Dist. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 3:12 pm by Arthur F. Coon
  “The Book” is the most widely used and judicially recognized real estate treatise in California and is cited by practicing attorneys and courts throughout the state. [read post]
29 Jul 2010, 3:45 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
That issue was determined by the Appellate Term, 9th & 10th Judicial Districts, in [Jones] v. [read post]
1 Nov 2013, 3:25 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Marin Municipal Water Dist., etc. (1st Dist. 2013) 216 Cal.App.4th 614; Save Panoche Valley v. [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 3:40 pm by Arthur F. Coon
Trustees of the California State University (2015) 242 Cal.App.4th 833, 851-852), the Court also acknowledged that “[t]he distinction between elements of a project and measures designed to mitigate impacts of the project may not always be clear” (quoting Lotus v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:00 am by Kurt R. Karst
   District Court’s Holding The Court first held that S&G Labs is a “laboratory” as defined by EKRA. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 5:42 am by Eugene Volokh
(i.e. birthday greetings, holiday invitations, condolences, days of special meaning, family events, etc. etc.) are impacted. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 6:23 am by Joy Waltemath
Observing that a public employee’s sworn testimony is not categorically entitled to First Amendment protection simply because it is speech as a citizen on a matter of public concern, the Court noted that under Pickering v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 6:58 am by Russell Knight
FIRST COLONY LIFE INS., 814 NE 2d 960 – Ill: Appellate Court, 1st Dist., 3rd Div. 2004 Any order before a final order in a divorce is essentially deleted upon entry of the Judgment of Dissolution of Marriage. [read post]