Search for: "State, in Interest of Dc"
Results 1 - 20
of 4,269
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2008, 3:32 pm
United States Department of the Treasury. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 4:39 pm
According to the enforcement complaint, uPI’s consent order requires it to “not import into the United States, sell for importation into the United States, or sell or offer for sale in the United States after importation, or knowingly aid, abet, encourage, participate in, or induce importation into the United States, the sale for importation into the United States, or the sale, offer for sale, or use in the United States after… [read post]
29 Jan 2013, 6:10 am
Judge McCoy said the public's interest in learning about the deaths exceeded concerns in keeping the information confidential, notwithstanding state and federal measures favoring nondisclosure. [read post]
19 Sep 2008, 9:31 am
(In a way McCain is really more from the DC area than anywhere else. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 10:42 am
Fortunately, How Appealing has this report on the interesting doings from the DC Circuit today:"In my judgment, the majority opinion illustrates the magnetic pull that the Guidelines still occasionally exert over appellate courts in cases involving sentences outside the Guidelines range. [read post]
25 Apr 2013, 8:40 am
See below for an announcement regarding an extremely interesting conference on Non-State Law next week in Washington, DC Symposium of the International Legal Theory Interest Group, titled “The Rise of Non-State Law” May 2, 2013, 8:30 a.m. [read post]
28 May 2008, 11:27 am
DC State Superintendet of Education Deborah Gist is largely unknown the the public, but she does have a role in the DC public schools. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 8:28 am
(ICF Metro DC Chapter Event Info.)Related posts: New Conflict Coaching Special Interest Group; Conflict Coaching: Advising the Mediating Manager; International Coach Federation Webinar Features Ombuds. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 3:30 am
Anyone who calls DC home will undoubtedly find both the history lesson and the discussion of more recent times interesting and can find the article here. [read post]
15 Nov 2013, 11:08 pm
Here’s an announcement I’ve received that may be of interest to people in DC, Boston, and Irvine: In early December, the Department of Commerce’s Acting General Counsel will lead the 18th U.S. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 4:01 pm
Before we get to the technicalities of property division in DC, we must first distinguish between community property states and equitable distribution states. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 10:00 am
It arises out of the interests of shareholders. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 8:45 pm
Luckern issued a Notice To The Parties in Certain DC-DC Controllers and Products Containing the Same (Inv. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 9:09 pm
[Earlier I noted an event sponsored by the Historical Society of the District of Columbia Circuit, entitled "The DC Circuit in the McCarthy Era: United States v. [read post]
17 Aug 2007, 10:00 pm
Secrecy News brings word of a really interesting state secrets decision from the DC Circuit: In an unusual move that may signal a new, more discriminating judicial view of the state secrets privilege, a federal appeals court has reinstated (pdf) a lawsuit which a lower court had dismissed after the government invoked the state secrets privilege. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 2:41 pm
This is a particularly interesting situation I recently encountered. [read post]
26 May 2017, 7:08 am
I am excited to share this call for papers (available as a PDF here: Poverty States Call-for-Papers DC Mar. 2017) and hope many of you will chose to participate. [read post]
30 Nov 2014, 3:09 pm
Ever since the election triumphs in Oregon, Alaska and DC, interested parties have been asking where marijuana legalization will strike next. [read post]
7 May 2020, 7:11 am
Via email from FoIB Sean K:"DC City Council Withdraws Business Interruption Coverage Proposal"Okay, interesting, but so what? [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 10:35 am
Rather than applying to any employee who performs any services in DC, the Amendment states that it only applies to (1) employees who spend (or for prospective employees, are anticipated to spend) more than half their time working in DC for the employer, or (2) if the employer is based in DC, employees who “regularly” spend a “substantial amount” of time working in DC, and not more than half their time working for the employer… [read post]
