Search for: "State Bd. of Control v. Superior Court"
Results 61 - 79
of 79
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Sep 2013, 4:00 am
Most, if not all, states have theft laws that substantially track the Model Penal Code. [read post]
22 Jan 2013, 2:43 am
Bd. [read post]
31 Dec 2012, 7:47 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 11:43 am
There, the Court held that nuclear whistleblowers were not protected when they raised safety concerns to their superiors. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 12:27 pm
Hackensack Bd. of Educ., 90 N.J. 145, 151 (1982) (quoting Atlantic City v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 2:41 pm
California State Lands Commission)? [read post]
29 Oct 2011, 2:33 pm
The superior court sustained the appeal. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 4:25 am
Pursuant to a Court Order dated February 5, 2009, t [read post]
17 Sep 2011, 4:07 am
Walsh, et al.; SEC v. [read post]
3 Jul 2011, 7:50 pm
Superior Court (1987) 191 Cal.App.3d 1136, 1140, 236 Cal.Rptr. 751 [same].) ? [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
State v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
11 Apr 2010, 6:32 pm
Supreme Court in Marek v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 12:27 pm
State Bd. of Med. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
Personnel Bd. of Jefferson County, Ala., No. 08-488Title VII/ (1) Can a court-appointed receiver be sued as an employer under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 for retaliatory employment decisions made during his receivership? [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 1:39 am
Superior Court, 33 Cal. 3d 419, 437, 440, 445, 447, 452 (1983); United States v. [read post]
30 Jan 2008, 7:35 am
However, denial of one petition is reversed where the state court's lack of notification and petitioner's prompt filing after receiving a response to his inquiry to the state court justified tolling. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Ct. 649 (2006), denial of habeas petition by district court is affirmed where the state courts did not unreasonably apply clearly established federal law. [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 9:13 am
Indiana State Bd. of Tax Com'rs v. [read post]
