Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court" Results 221 - 240 of 403
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jan 2016, 7:17 am by Eric Goldman
For every negative thing the author states, another poster could state the opposite with equal conviction and neither would be a provable fact. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am by David Gans
Board of Education on for misrepresenting Reconstruction history. [read post]
3 Nov 2015, 5:04 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a 65-page opinion certified for publication and filed October 22, 2015, the Second Appellate District Court of Appeal affirmed the Los Angeles County Superior Court’s judgment denying writ petitions by the City of Beverly Hills (“City”) and the Beverly Hills Unified School District (“District”). [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 6:01 am by Administrator
He said: Apart … from the question of contract …, it is said that in revenue cases there is a doctrine that the Court may ignore the legal position and regard what is called “the substance of the matter”, and that here the substance of the matter is that the annuitant was serving the Duke for something equal to his former salary or wages, and that therefore, while he is so serving, the annuity must be treated as salary or wages. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 3:31 am by Eugene Kontorovich
United States, 171 F.2d 921, 936 (1st Cir.1948); United States v. al Liby, 23 F. [read post]
24 Aug 2015, 6:07 am
This right applies equally to online speech. [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 5:55 am by SHG
Has enough time passed since the joy of Obergefell v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:20 am by Native American Rights Fund
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (Indian Gaming - Tribal-State Contracts)Yurok Tribe v. [read post]
5 May 2015, 6:00 am by JB
Sandford, which is easily Roe's equal in its influence and practical consequences.) [read post]
23 Apr 2015, 11:32 am by Jim Gerl
State Board of Education 874 F.2d 1036,  441 IDELR 433 (5th Cir. 1989). [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 2:00 am
Superior Court is equally as helpful, but for a slightly different reason. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 9:33 am by Katharyn Grant (US)
  Thus, many courts have held that if the advertisement generally asserts that a product is superior, but does not explicitly refer to scientific tests as support, the plaintiff still carries the burden to affirmatively prove that the claim is false, i.e., that the defendant’s product is equal or inferior to the plaintiff’s. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
But because we conclude that the Board’s factual findings support a constitutionally valid distinction between patterns of subsistence use, and because the Board’s regulations do not otherwise violate the law, we affirm the superior court’s grant of summary judgment to the State, upholding the statute and the Board regulations against the Fund’s legal challenge. [read post]