Search for: "State Board of Equalization v. Superior Court" Results 21 - 40 of 401
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2011, 9:47 am by Lovechilde
Board of Education - one of the most important decisions ever handed down by the United States Supreme Court - illuminating the way forward. [read post]
25 Sep 2022, 12:37 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Last month, the California Secretary of State appealed the decision by a California Superior Court striking down as unconstitutional California’s board diversity law, which required all publicly traded companies headquartered in the State to include a minimum number of female directors. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 11:13 am by admin
Cernak, Schiff Hardin LLP Reprinted with permission Post originally appeared on the AntitrustConnect Blog On October 14, the Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in North Carolina Board of Dental Examiners v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 1:34 pm by Stuart Kaplow
Superior Court judge, the Honorable Terry Green, granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment without a trial in Robin Crest, et al. v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:40 am
The Appellate Division of the New Jersey Superior Court, in Zehl v. [read post]
15 May 2015, 10:20 am by Native American Rights Fund
Fond Du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa (Indian Gaming - Tribal-State Contracts)Yurok Tribe v. [read post]
28 Apr 2018, 5:54 am by Patricia Salkin
Byrne, stating that the project significantly deviated from the Planning Board approvals. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 9:03 am
When I reported last Friday that Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Terry Green had ruled in favor of the plaintiffs in their challenge to California's board quota law, AB 979, all I had was a brief minute order from the court. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 4:24 pm by Patricia Salkin
As to the rational basis prong, the court stated that as long as one of the reasons advanced by the zoning board for its decisions is deemed a legitimate rational basis, the plaintiff does not have a viable equal protection claim. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 10:53 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
But because we conclude that the Board’s factual findings support a constitutionally valid distinction between patterns of subsistence use, and because the Board’s regulations do not otherwise violate the law, we affirm the superior court’s grant of summary judgment to the State, upholding the statute and the Board regulations against the Fund’s legal challenge. [read post]
9 Sep 2013, 11:25 am by Richard A. Epstein
Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action, which is now before the United States Supreme Court, illustrates all the treacherous crosscurrents in modern equal protection law. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 5:49 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Superior Court (2005) 36 Cal.4th 148 regarding unconscionability analysis of class action waivers in arbitration agreements. [read post]