Search for: "State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board"
Results 21 - 40
of 121
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
15 Aug 2021, 9:30 pm
” In 1900 this "rule of one" as then set out in then Civil Service Law §14 was struck down by the Court of Appeals as unconstitutional.In People v Mosher, 163 NY 32, the Court of Appeals held that "if the civil service commissioners have power to certify to the appointing officer only one applicant of several who are eligible and whom they have, by their own methods, ascertained to be fitted for a particular position, and their decision is final… [read post]
18 May 2021, 6:54 am
Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Harr, State Workers’ Insurance Fund and Uninsured Employers Guaranty Fund), the answer was yes. [read post]
28 Jan 2021, 6:21 am
Nowicki filed a claim with the Workplace Safety Insurance Board (“WSIB”) for Traumatic Mental Stress due to the altercation she had experienced with her supervisor on October 29, 2015, in which he had grabbed the doorframe and behaved aggressively. [read post]
Louisiana Legislature Calls Itself Into Second Extraordinary Session and Includes Certain Tax Issues
30 Sep 2020, 8:46 am
If a company’s workers are independent contractors, the company does not have to withhold personal income taxes or pay into federal and state unemployment insurance funds on payments made to those contractors for services rendered. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:00 am
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board [Board], affirmed a Workers' Compensation Law Judge's decision denying the Employer's request. [read post]
28 Sep 2020, 7:00 am
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board [Board], affirmed a Workers' Compensation Law Judge's decision denying the Employer's request. [read post]
5 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
This outcome has been hinted at by the New York Workers’ Compensation Board, which in June released a bulletin stating that “[i]ndividuals who work in an environment where exposure risks are significantly higher are more likely to have compensable COVID-19 claims. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm
Federal guidelines, for example, were not binding on states. [read post]
5 Nov 2019, 4:00 am
It is arguable that protecting clients against dishonest professionals through a compensation fund is not so clearly in the interest of the honest professionals who end up paying for the dishonesty of a small minority. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 3:00 am
The 2010 SpeechNow v. [read post]
17 Apr 2019, 9:35 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v MM (Scotland) was heard on 9th April. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 8:56 am
” Walling v. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 10:43 am
” Workers’ compensation, according to Frederick, would fall within his definition of “compensation” because the employer contributes to an insurance fund for every period that the employee works. [read post]
30 Oct 2018, 7:02 am
United States — imposes taxes on “compensation” paid by railroads to their workers. [read post]
9 Aug 2018, 2:37 pm
Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm
But the lack of compensation was fatal to her claim. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 7:01 pm
The Labor Department also says employee misclassification also generates substantial losses to state and federal treasuries, and to the Social Security and Medicare funds, as well as to state unemployment insurance and workers compensation funds. [read post]
20 Feb 2018, 7:30 am
He points out that when the union was bargaining with the state, the state wanted to save money on health insurance and indicated that it could not afford across-the-board salary increases, but the union “took opposite positions. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 11:34 am
He points out that when the union was bargaining with the state, the state wanted to save money on health insurance and indicated that it could not afford across-the-board salary increases, but the union “took opposite positions. [read post]
