Search for: "State Ex Rel. Attorney General v. Land"
Results 21 - 40
of 101
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2015, 11:56 am
Berkeley Hillside Preservation, et al. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2015, 9:28 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 5:19 pm
Yesterday, the Senate Judiciary Committee began the first of two day-long hearings on the nomination of Loretta Lynch to be the next Attorney General of the United States. [read post]
11 Oct 2009, 8:59 am
State, 160 P.3d 507 (Mont. 2007); Gamble v. [read post]
26 May 2023, 11:37 am
Caremark, Inc., 584 F.3d 655, 658 (5th Cir. 2009) (citing McCarthy ex rel. [read post]
15 Feb 2020, 10:06 am
ADDITION: One new point: We would not be having the conversations we are about the degree to which the Attorney General is merely a lackey and lickspittle of the President were we living in the system found in roughly 45 of our states, where the Attorney General is not an appointee of the governor. [read post]
13 Oct 2015, 9:48 am
State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 10:02 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
21 Nov 2019, 10:03 am
Standing Bear’s case, United States, ex rel. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 2:45 pm
However, as a practical matter this never happens because the Attorney General will generally not commence condemnation actions without an appropriation. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:46 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
15 Jun 2021, 7:36 am
The issue soon arose explicitly in a case called People ex rel. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
Dollar General Corp. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2018, 2:15 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 2:36 am
Hawaii Tourism Authority ex rel. [read post]
20 Jan 2016, 8:52 am
GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS California Building Industry Association v. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 9:00 am
The case is captioned “THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK ex rel. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 8:31 am
In United States ex rel. [read post]
