Search for: "State Ex Rel. Daniels v. Daniels" Results 1 - 20 of 146
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm by admin
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am by Shea Denning
Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:29 pm by Javier Dominguez
This decision follows the Supreme Court’s June 1 opinion in United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm by ernst
  Almost all states had some kind of blue-sky law by 1931. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
We know that the original electorate was remarkably restricted at the time, even if it would become more inclusive relatively early in the 19th century. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am by Guest Author
An independent forum for ex post contestation is a valuable tool to guard against arbitrariness or domination based on epistemic advantages, which may proliferate in the administrative state.[12] In Canada, judicial review on certain grounds is so important that it is constitutionally protected.[13]   I fear that common good constitutionalism, like other modern theories of the administrative state that take on a hue of political constitutionalism, may… [read post]