Search for: "State Ex Rel. Daniels v. Daniels"
Results 1 - 20
of 146
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Apr 2024, 3:33 pm
The results of one study by Hershel Jick and colleagues, presented as a letter to the editor, reported a relative risk of 0.58, with a 95% exact confidence interval, 0.03 – 2.9.[2] A year later, two researches, reporting a study based upon Medicaid databases, found no significant associations with PPA.[3] The FDA, however, did not approve a final monograph for PPA, with recognition of its “safe and effective” status because of occasional reports of hemorrhagic stroke that… [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 7:03 am
Other states have similar, recent decisions [see Western Millwork v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 8:29 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:00 am
Supreme Court’s denial of review in State v. [read post]
20 Sep 2023, 7:47 am
[1] Garcoa, Inc. v. [read post]
1 Sep 2023, 4:00 am
The justices faced heightened security risks, Thomas noted, after the leak of the court’s majority opinion to overturn Roe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
United States KJ 599/1 40 6/16/23 21-1052 United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
United States KJ 599/1 40 6/16/23 21-1052 United States ex rel. [read post]
30 Jun 2023, 1:29 pm
This decision follows the Supreme Court’s June 1 opinion in United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jun 2023, 9:30 pm
Almost all states had some kind of blue-sky law by 1931. [read post]
19 Apr 2023, 9:37 am
From Al Namani v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 11:59 am
From today's North Dakota Supreme Court decision in Wrigley v. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 2:59 pm
United States ex rel. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 6:30 am
We know that the original electorate was remarkably restricted at the time, even if it would become more inclusive relatively early in the 19th century. [read post]
27 Dec 2022, 3:08 pm
B.L. ex rel. [read post]
12 Nov 2022, 10:45 am
An independent forum for ex post contestation is a valuable tool to guard against arbitrariness or domination based on epistemic advantages, which may proliferate in the administrative state.[12] In Canada, judicial review on certain grounds is so important that it is constitutionally protected.[13] I fear that common good constitutionalism, like other modern theories of the administrative state that take on a hue of political constitutionalism, may… [read post]
14 Oct 2022, 4:57 am
Aug. 20, 2021) United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:39 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:44 pm
From the opinion (USA, ex rel. [read post]
7 May 2022, 5:01 am
… In Daniels v. [read post]