Search for: "State Ex Rel. Day v. King County"
Results 1 - 20
of 28
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2019, 5:42 am
On March 5, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case Marcella King Piazza v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 4:50 am
On March 5, 2019, the Supreme Court of Ohio heard oral argument in Marcella King Piazza v. [read post]
17 Dec 2007, 12:06 am
A (copies of subpoenas) Ex. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
In a 1918 case, State ex rel. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:31 pm
Ongoing litigation in United States ex rel. [read post]
22 Feb 2009, 4:25 pm
King, 2nd Dist. [read post]
28 Sep 2010, 7:26 am
U.S. ex rel. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 10:59 am
Citizens for Environmental Responsibility v State ex rel. 14th Dist. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am
King by King v. [read post]
18 May 2011, 3:00 am
King by King v. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:59 am
After his arraignment in New York City Criminal Court, the case was transferred to the IDV Part in Kings County Supreme Court where a nonjury trial was conducted. [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
15 Jan 2019, 6:51 pm
In New York v. [read post]
30 Oct 2008, 8:27 am
In denying defendants' motion based on their pre-loss policy cancellation ground, Kings County Supreme Court Justice Carolyn Demarest found that defendants had not established that the policy was properly cancelled before December 11, 2005 because: (1) Standard had not sent a copy of its cancellation notice to defendants, as required by the policy's "Broker's Cancellation Clause"; and (2) Standard had not complied with the cancellation notice requirements… [read post]
23 Oct 2021, 2:40 pm
” Ermini v. [read post]
11 Apr 2015, 4:57 pm
Peluso, 192 Misc 2d 33, 37 [Crim Ct., Kings County 2002]). [read post]
14 May 2019, 4:08 am
United States, ex rel. [read post]
30 Nov 2010, 10:25 am
Whether the district court erred when it dismissed the case in reliance on State ex rel. [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 3:53 am
The continuous representation toll ends upon the conclusion of the matter or upon the attorney’s withdrawal from representation (see Shumsky, 96 NY2d at 170-171; Williamson ex rel. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Mar. 8, 2006); King v. [read post]
