Search for: "State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Green" Results 1 - 20 of 25
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jul 2010, 7:22 am by Frank Pasquale
The Health Care "Market"Bremmer does not talk much about health care in his book, but it appears to be one important sector where the relative role of the government in state capitalist and "free market" regimes is flipped. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
First, there is a lot of new material regarding the “loyal denominator” issue (see here and here): whether the former Confederate states were to be included in the Article V total of states of which three fourths were required to ratify an amendment, or whether (as I think) only three fourths of the states represented in Congress were required, because rebel states’ Article V naysaying power, like their Article I right to be… [read post]
18 May 2019, 9:27 am by MOTP
Relative to the entire caseload of a particular collection law firm, few cases go to trial and if they do, such trials typically take no more than a few minutes. [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 2:46 am by Kelly
Ambu A/S (Filewrapper) District Court W D Pennsylvania: Convenience of false marking plaintiff ‘in the business of litigation’ given little weight in venue dispute: United States of America, ex rel. et. al. v. [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 12:25 pm by John Elwood
United States ex rel. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 11:14 am by Eugene Volokh
My UCLA Amicus Brief Clinic students and I just filed a brief on this subject on behalf of the Libertarian Law Council and the Institute for Free Speech in Green v. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 10:32 am by admin
President Andrew Johnson and his allies hoped to carry out a swift reconstruction, requiring only that southern states ratify the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery, repudiate all war debts, and void ordinances of succession.17 The Radical Republicans, led by the “Dictator of Congress,” Rep. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Haviland, No. 07-3380 Grant of a conditional writ of habeas corpus is affirmed where: 1) petitioner sought to represent himself at trial, and the trial court's failure to rule on his requests to proceed pro se deprived him of his Sixth Amendment right to self-representation; and 2) state courts' objectiv [read post]
14 Sep 2012, 8:34 am by WSLL
Sun Oil Co., 638 P.2d 147, 151 (Wyo. 1981) (citing Johnson v. [read post]