Search for: "State Farm County Mutual Insurance of Texas" Results 41 - 56 of 56
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jul 2011, 11:17 am by Law Lady
State Farm Lloyds, 202 S.W.3d 744 (Tex. 2006).Chinese Drywall: CHINESE DRYWALL-RELATED LOSS NOT AN 'ACCIDENT' FOR COVERAGE PURPOSES, Lopez v. [read post]
26 Jul 2012, 10:43 am by Mark S. Humphreys
The style of the case is, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
20 Sep 2013, 8:44 am by Don Cruse
STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS, No. 12-0983 : The petition involves the Texas statute governing the liens that hospitals can place over settlement proceeds to injury victims (Texas Property Code chapter 55). set for December 4 THE CITY OF WATAUGA v. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:36 pm by Don Cruse
STATE FARM COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY OF TEXAS, No. 12-0983 Opinion of the Court Under chapter 55 of the Texas Property Code, hospitals that treat an injured patient can assert a lien against that person’s personal-injury cause of action. [read post]
20 Jun 2011, 8:54 am by Judge Bonnie Sudderth
  State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003). [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 5:46 pm by Law Lady
STATE FARM FLORIDA INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. 3rd District.Insurance -- Homeowners -- Hurricane damage to home -- Attorney's fees -- Insurer's post-suit payment of additional policy proceeds entitles insured to section 627.428 attorney's fees where the insurer wrongfully caused its insured to resort to litigation in order to resolve a conflict with its insurer when it was within the… [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am by Don Cruse
An unresolved request for UDJA fees can undermine the finality of a summary judgment FARM BUREAU COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 11:00 am by Don Cruse
An unresolved request for UDJA fees can undermine the finality of a summary judgment FARM BUREAU COUNTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 9:22 am by Christa Culver
Reply of petitioner Charles Mix County Title: Yankton Sioux Tribe v. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 12:50 am
The appeals court upheld a jury's decision that State Farm owed the couple about $200,000 for wind damage. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:15 am by Anna Christensen
WrobelAmicus brief for the Montana Farm Bureau Federation and the Cato InstituteAmicus brief for the Edison Electric Institute, National Hydropower Association, and Public Utility District No. 1 of Snohomish County, WashingtonAmicus brief for the Montana Water Resources AssociationPetitioner's reply _________________________________________________________________ DISCLOSURE: Howe & Russell and Akin Gump represent parties in the two cases below; these cases are listed… [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:39 am
State Farm Awarded $15.4 Million in RICO Suit Against Doctors The Legal Intelligencer In a civil RICO suit that accused three doctors of operating a fraud mill that sharply inflated medical care costs for car accident victims, a federal jury last week awarded more than $15.4 million to State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Law Div. 2005).Heeding presumptions are something that exists in some states (Massachusetts, Missouri, Oklahoma), doesn’t in others (California, Connecticut, Alabama), and is limited in still others (New, Jersey, Pennsylvania, Texas). [read post]
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm by smtaber
That means elevating buildings, making taller and stronger dams and seawalls, rerouting water systems, restricting certain developments, changing farming practices, and ultimately moving people, plants, and animals out of harm’s way. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am by Bexis
  We, of course think that's wrong under Erie - where the default should be, if a form of liability hasn't been recognized by a state court, then it should be dismissed by a federal court applying that state's law in a diversity action.ConnecticutIn Gerrity v. [read post]
18 May 2020, 6:33 pm by scottgaille
  Similarly, cities and counties may have issued more restrictive guidance than the binding orders of state governors. [read post]