Search for: "State Farm Ins. Co. v. Worker's Compensation Court" Results 21 - 40 of 42
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Oct 2015, 6:01 am
The Superintendent's interpretation is entitled to deference, since it is neither irrational nor unreasonable, nor counter to the clear wording of a statutory provision (see LMK Psychological Servs., P.C. v State Farm Mut. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 4:31 pm by Michael B. Stack
    In one or two sentences, how did you end up in workerscompensation? [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 5:00 am by Kevin
Roberts Dairy Co., 24 N.W.2d 571 (Neb. 1946) (workers compensation claim involving an employee who hit his thumb with a hammer) Wringer v. [read post]
17 Sep 2010, 3:56 pm by Meg Martin
Similar to the Court’s reasoning in State Farm Mutual Auto Ins. [read post]