Search for: "State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co." Results 21 - 40 of 320
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2013, 8:08 pm by John W. Arden
Darius Sturmer, contributor to Antitrust Law Daily.A physician and a pair of physical therapy clinics, along with their principals, could have violated the federal RICO Act by orchestrating an alleged scheme to defraud State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. through the filing of claims for physical therapy services that were medically unnecessary or not actually performed, the federal district court in Ann Arbor, Michigan has decided… [read post]
18 Jul 2008, 4:12 pm
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co., Nos. 06-1442, 06-1467, 06-1469, 2008 WL 2736656 (10th Cir. [read post]
14 Mar 2009, 3:32 pm
In a provocative essay on State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
11 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
In the case of State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. [read post]
11 Jan 2007, 9:04 am
This time, it was people victimized once by Katrina, before State Farm got to them for a second go-round:Jan. 11 (Bloomberg) -- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. must pay a Mississippi couple $2.7 million for the loss of their property, a judge and jury ruled in a test case over how much Hurricane Katrina damage is covered by insurance.The judge, deciding actual damages without the jury, awarded $223,000 for the home… [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 10:06 am
Insurer Suit": Matthew Guarnaccia of Law360.com has an article (subscription required for full access) that begins, "The Eleventh Circuit on Tuesday said a group of automotive repair shops cannot reinstate claims against State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. and other insurers over an alleged scheme to manipulate vehicle repair costs, shooting down arguments that the court was at fault for the lateness of their… [read post]
1 Oct 2010, 9:41 am by Jeanne Long
State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., No. 292716, the Court of Appeals held that although an insured motorist had violated the plain language of her insurance contract by failing to join all tortfeasors in her action against her insurance company to recover damages caused by an uninsured driver, the insurance company was required to show prejudice to itself stemming from her violation before it could be entitled to summary… [read post]