Search for: "State Highway Commission v. District Court" Results 1 - 20 of 218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2015, 6:04 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
An excerpt: Given New Mexico’s highways that traverse both state and tribal lands, it is not uncommon that a tribal police officer patrolling those highways may be commissioned as a deputy county sheriff to arrest non-Indians and prosecute them in state court when they commit state traffic offenses on tribal land. [read post]
1 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission, (D MD, Nov. 30, 2015), a Maryland federal district court rejected an Establishment Clause challenge to a 40-foot tall Veteran's Memorial in the shape of a cross. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 11:30 am
WalkerIn February of 2008, the state Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District held in Douda v. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 10:53 pm
Moshe Leib (Leib) appealed from the district court's dismissal of his suit, brought under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
22 Nov 2018, 6:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
On March 1, 1961, the Maryland–National Capital Park and Planning Commission (the “Commission”), a state entity, obtained title to the Cross and the land on which it sits. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 9:25 am by Native American Rights Fund
Federal Trial Courts Bulletin http://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/dct/2016dct.htmlIn re Montoya (Bankruptcy - Automatic Stay)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html State, ex rel. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
The District Court granted summary judgment for the Commission and the American Legion, concluding that the Cross satisfies both the test announced in Lemon and the analysis applied by Justice Stephen Breyer in upholding a Ten Commandments monument in Van Orden v. [read post]
The district court dismissed Sanderson’s retaliation claim because her discrimination charge filed with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) alleged retaliation but based the claim on different events than she laid out in her lawsuit. [read post]
19 Jan 2007, 1:02 pm
In a brief order, the Court granted review of Federal Election Commission v. [read post]
24 Sep 2018, 1:08 pm by Deborah Heller
Township of Scott, Pennsylvania (17-647): This case asks whether the Court should reconsider Williamson County Regional Planning Commission, v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 1:45 pm by Fred Kessler
District Court for the Southern District of New York recently clarified the constitutional uses of toll revenue in American Trucking Associations v. [read post]
1 Apr 2020, 4:33 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a published opinion filed March 24, 2020, the Fourth District Court of Appeal (Division One) reversed a judgment of dismissal with prejudice, entered by the San Diego County Superior Court after sustaining a demurrer without leave on statute of limitations grounds to a group’s action challenging the CEQA review for Caltrans’ Interstate 5 (I-5)/State Route 56 (SR 56) freeway interchange project (the “Project”). [read post]