Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V D. M. R., Appellant" Results 21 - 40 of 47
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2010, 2:16 am by Kelly
(Ron Coleman’s Likelihood of Confusion) ONEL – Pieter Veeze’s 2010 Markenforum speech (Class 46) France Cour dappel Paris: French law implementing London Protocol procedural so to be enforced immediately with retroactive effect: Unilever v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 9:28 am by Victoria Kwan
While Sotomayor was in Washington, Gorsuch was in the Bluegrass State with Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky. [read post]
21 Jun 2009, 10:00 pm
(BLOG@IP::JUR) New Madrid fees for applications designating the EU to become effective 12 August (Class 46) Latest European appellations registered: Polish TSG Olej rydzowy for oils; Italian PGI Abbacchio Romano for meat (Class 46) India Patents, public interest and pricing: Madras High Court decision in M C Jayasingh v Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd & Ors (Spicy IP) Ramkumar patent case: New Delhi Customs favours Samsung; Customs order stayed by Madras High Court… [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
 It’s an interesting issue, and if IBS succeeds, there’s a potential for huge ramifications in the online music ecosystem, so I thought I’d provide a closer look. [read post]
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
: IPO announces public consultation on trade mark fees (BLOG@IP::JUR) (Class 46) (Class 46) (Class 46) (Out-Law) (IPKat) US Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Patent Reform Act 2009 (Inventive Step) (Patent Prospector) (IAM) (Patent Baristas) (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patent Docs) (Patent Docs) (Law360) (Hal Wegner)   Global Global - General The global economic crisis and the intellectual property ecosystem IP Think Tank podcast 6 March 2009 (IP Think Tank)… [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 1:19 pm by ligitsec
In March 1979, an undisclosed source provided The Nation Magazine with the unpublished manuscript of “A Time to Heal: The Autobiography of Gerald R. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm by Eugene Volokh
The court reasoned that the publication by respondents of the unsavory incidents in the past life of appellant after she had reformed, coupled with her true name, was not justified by any standard of morals or ethics known to us and was a direct invasion of her inalienable right guaranteed to her by our Constitution, to pursue and obtain happiness. [read post]