Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V. David Olson, Petitioner"
Results 1 - 12
of 12
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Oct 2008, 4:00 am
Ted Olson of Washington, D.C., will argue for the petitioner, and David Frederick of Washington, D.C., and Douglas Hallward-Diemeier of the Solicitor General’s office will argue for the respondent. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:42 am
Olson of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher in Washington, D.C., for the petitioners. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:38 am
Olson of Gibson Dunn & Crutcher in Washington, D.C., for the petitioners. [read post]
11 Jan 2009, 9:00 pm
Ted Olson of Washington, D.C., will argue for the petitioners, Thomas Waldo of Juneau, Alaska, will argue for the respondents, and Solicitor General Greg Garre will argue for the federal respondents in support of the petitioner. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 4:00 am
Seth Waxman of Washington, D.C., and Deputy Solicitor General Edwin Kneedler will argue for the petitioner, and David Frederick of Washington, D.C., will argue for the respondent. [read post]
22 Jul 2010, 1:43 pm
Warsaw (PDF) Brief for Respondent David J. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 6:28 pm
Jakes, the attorney for the petitioners, responded that it may be “patent-eligible. [read post]
1 Mar 2013, 6:15 am
Briefly: Jonathan Macey of this blog and Walter Olson at Cato@Liberty analyze Wednesday’s opinion in Gabelli v. [read post]
25 Apr 2017, 3:39 am
” Briefly: In The Washington Post’s Volokh Conspiracy blog, David Post weighs in on Justice Clarence Thomas’ solo dissent last week in Nelson v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 4:06 am
Yesterday the justices also affirmed the lower court’s judgment in Washington v. [read post]
24 May 2010, 7:48 pm
” Bill Mears of CNN reports on the decision in United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 6:38 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell represented the petitioner in the case.] [read post]
