Search for: "State Of Washington, Respondent V. Russell A. Ford, Appellant"
Results 1 - 7
of 7
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Mar 2018, 4:31 am
The first is United States v. [read post]
15 May 2009, 7:49 am
Lyght, 441 F.3d 96 (2d Cir. 2006), discussed below, in Ford v. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 3:44 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., is among the counsel on an amicus brief (discussed in the post by Marty Lederman, who is also on the brief) in support of the respondents in Zubik. [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 12:13 pm
The petition asks if an appellate court violates Strickland v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 4:29 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
9 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as co-counsel to the respondent in this case.] [read post]
