Search for: "State Personnel Board v. Superior Court"
Results 1 - 20
of 146
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Sep 2015, 2:00 pm
Thus, once the State Personnel Board has issued findings, or failed to do so, “the employee may proceed with a damages action in superior court regardless of whether the [State Personnel Board’s] findings are favorable or unfavorable to the employee. [read post]
9 Jan 2013, 9:05 am
State Personnel Board (1/7/13) --- Cal.App.4th --- is another decision dealing with the essential functions of a police officer. [read post]
28 Dec 2012, 8:00 am
Bjorndal demurred, arguing that Pena had not filed a timely administrative complaint with the State Personnel Board. [read post]
26 Feb 2009, 9:02 pm
Before a state employee can bring suit under the California Whistleblower law, he or she must seek relief before the State Personnel Board. [read post]
Officer’s California whistleblower claim not collaterally estopped by State Personnel Board decision
16 Sep 2015, 8:20 am
In State Board of Chiropractic Examiners v Superior Court, a case with a similar procedural history, the state high court held that “the Legislature did not intend the State Personnel Board’s findings [in a whistleblower retaliation case] to have a preclusive effect against the complaining employee. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 7:00 am
The North Carolina Court of Appeals recently issued an interesting decision in Wang v. [read post]
12 Aug 2014, 8:16 am
And I wouldn't take emails from Court personnel as the gospel. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 1:16 pm
State Board of Labor Relations et al., Region 16 appealed to the Superior Court challenging a decision by the state board of labor relations (“SBLR”) which concluded that the school district had unilaterally changed a condition of employment in violation of Conn. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 12:43 pm
Further, the Court stated that there is a strong public interest in assessing how the District’s board treated the serious allegations of misconduct against its highest-ranking administrator. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual - a 645 page e-book addresses the relevant laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions, to be considered in a layoff of personnel in the event of a reduction of force by the State of New York as the employer and its political subdivisions. [read post]
9 May 2020, 2:20 am
The Layoff, Preferred List and Reinstatement Manual - a 645 page e-book addresses the relevant laws, rules and regulations, and selected court and administrative decisions, to be considered in a layoff of personnel in the event of a reduction of force by the State of New York as the employer and its political subdivisions. [read post]
2 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
The Superior Court concluded that the Board of Rights' findings were not supported by the weight of the evidence, granted the petition, and ordered Joaquin reinstated. [read post]
18 Feb 2008, 11:00 am
Superior Court, case no. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
State Personnel Board, 92 Cal. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:00 am
State Personnel Board, 92 Cal. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:02 am
Circuit had also previously used this language, and Fischbach cites the general rule that courts cannot serve as super-personnel boards. [read post]
6 Mar 2020, 9:40 am
McBride v. [read post]
30 Jul 2015, 9:56 am
Superior Court (1990) 51 Cal.3d 335, 342.) [read post]
17 May 2022, 12:15 am
State Personnel Board, 92 Cal. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 12:27 am
Providing for the defense and indemnification of employees being sued as a result of the performance, or failure to perform, their official dutiesMatter of Matyas v Board of Educ., Chenango Forks Cent. [read post]
