Search for: "State ex rel. Jackson v. Dept. of Youth Serv." Results 1 - 2 of 2
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Petitioners assert that the books are per se inappropriate as they are “pornographic,” “serve[] no educational purpose,” and are “potentially illegal obscenity. [read post]
9 May 2024, 7:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
  Petitioners assert that the books are per se inappropriate as they are “pornographic,” “serve[] no educational purpose,” and are “potentially illegal obscenity. [read post]