Search for: "State in Interest of ABM"
Results 21 - 39
of 39
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Dec 2016, 4:30 pm
ABM Security Services, Inc., the California Supreme Court determined that employers are prohibited from implementing “on-call” rest breaks. [read post]
27 Dec 2016, 3:41 pm
ABM Security Services, Inc. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 11:34 am
ABM Security Services, Inc, the California Supreme Court reversed the 2nd District Court of Appeal, concluding that, “state law prohibits on-duty and on-call rest periods. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:01 pm
ABM Security Services, Inc., 233 Cal. [read post]
3 May 2016, 7:24 am
United States, et al., No. 16-126C, the United States Court of Federal Claims (“COFC”) found that Universal was not a “complete successor in interest” to ABM Security Services. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 4:35 pm
Fortis participated in a consortium of banks (including RBS and Banco Santander) in acquiring ABM AMRO, which was at the time the largest-ever bank acquisition. [read post]
17 Feb 2015, 9:35 am
” The trial court issued a tentative ruling stating, “if you are on call, you are not on break” and issued an award in favor of the class for over $55 million in damages, $31 million in pre-judgment interest, $2.5 million in penalties, and over $30 million in attorney fees. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 9:19 am
ABM Sec. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 7:26 am
ABM Security Services, Inc., January 29, 2015, Chaney, V.). [read post]
13 Jan 2015, 9:45 am
The trial court awarded plaintiffs approximately $90 million in damages, interest and penalties. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 1:27 pm
In 2012, the plaintiff’s moved for summary judgment arguing that the evidence was undisputed that ABM violated the law and that they were entitled to damages, interest, and penalties totaling $103.8 million. [read post]
5 Nov 2012, 11:11 pm
According to Judge Jagot’s opinion, ABM AMRO convinced S&P to use the these desired inputs, even though ABN AMRO had reason to know that at least some of the inputs did not correspond to known marketplace conditions. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 3:30 am
The district court concluded that ABM failed to show that the amount in controversy exceeded $5,000,000 as required to establish CAFA jurisdiction, and remanded the case to state court. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 1:26 pm
These factors can make it difficult for people interested in nose surgery to select the right nose surgeon. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:40 am
Abm Indus., __ Cal. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 1:32 pm
ABM Industries Incorporated (June 17, 2010) (D.C. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 11:50 am
The ABM court also reasoned that “while exclusive access to an area is not necessary to ‘control’ that area, exclusivity strongly supports that ‘control’ exists. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 3:48 pm
President Medvedev looks for new cooperation between the United States and Russia, while maintaining the balance of interests of each country. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 2:41 pm
The Plaintiffs were successful in showing ABM's control over the operations of SSA, Inc. considering the following: (1) ABM owned 100% of the voting securities in SSA, Inc., (2) SSA, Inc. does not hold annual board meetings, keep corporate minutes, or conduct its own audits, and (3) all but one of SSA, Inc.'s officers are ABM's officers. [read post]
