Search for: "State in Interest of C" Results 141 - 160 of 27,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2010, 8:34 am by Lynda Barack
Below is a link to a very interesting article about California’s harsh “three strikes” law and its perhaps unintended consequences. [read post]
18 May 2009, 8:12 am
Kent at C&C has this long post providing lots of helpful context for the Beard v . [read post]
10 Mar 2007, 7:55 am
The Court held that the principle is in any event a general principle of EC law as it is part of the constitutional traditions of the member States (confirming Joined Cases C-387/02, C-391/02 and C-403/02 Berlusconi and Others. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 7:33 am by Zneimer & Zneimer, P.C.
In Matter of C-K-D-, 2017 WL 2224919 (TSC May 2, 2017) a Teacher and Researcher in Autism Spectrum Disorders failed to qualify for a National Interest Waiver as the petitioner did not meet all three prongs of Matter of DHANASAR, 26 I. [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 8:00 am by Mike Habib, EA
§1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii), a taxpayer must serve a public interest rather than a private interest. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 6:05 am by Michael Geist
Meanwhile, across the street, the Senate was in its final third reading debate of Bill C-11, closing the day by passing the bill with 26 amendments that include a change that scopes out user content but leaves professional music intact, consistent with the government’s stated objectives. [read post]
16 May 2009, 6:46 am
"It's interesting to see the inevitable erosion between the state and the Brescia team. [read post]
24 Feb 2008, 2:16 am
The Court of Justice has handed down an interesting and important judgment in Case C-2/06 Willy Kempter AG in which it opens up the possibility even further to reopen and review national administrative decisions contrary to EC law. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
The rise in C-section births continues to raise alarm bells among all those interested in preventing Illinois birth injuries. [read post]
4 Aug 2009, 5:28 am
Furthermore, "[c]onstitutional protection of possessory interests is not diminished when the government, as opposed to a private individual, has paramount right to possession. [read post]
22 Mar 2023, 7:51 am by centerforartlaw
No Private Benefit Provision of 501(c)(3) Museums While § 501(c)(3) does not specifically mention private benefits restrictions,[16] it is found in the Treasury Regulation § 1.501(c)(3)-1(d)(1)(ii), which prohibits an organization from operating “for the benefit of private interests such as designated individuals, the creator or his family, shareholders of the organization, or persons controlled, directly or indirectly, by such private… [read post]