Search for: "State in Interest of Rdc"
Results 1 - 20
of 22
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Dec 2011, 5:41 pm
RDC consistently refused to do so and claims that this incited the oligarch to leverage his political influence with the Guatemalan government to take care of his interests for him.In August 2006, the President of Guatemala effectively nullified the concession agreement with FVG under Guatemalan law by declaring a separate equipment contract to be “injurious to the interests of the State”.RDC claims that this Lesivo declaration provided a… [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 11:20 am
RDC's version of the facts is as follows:In August of 2006, following the effective date of CAFTA, the Government of Guatemala issued a Presidential Decree declaring the privatization of the national railway rolling stock "lesivo," or against the interests of the State. [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:11 am
(Spoiler Alert: The indemnity for RDC has significant implications for financial institutions that offer RDC services.) [read post]
8 Aug 2017, 11:11 am
(Spoiler Alert: The indemnity for RDC has significant implications for financial institutions that offer RDC services.) [read post]
1 Oct 2019, 4:17 am
It is interesting to note that the Upper Tribunal concluded that it could not accept this evidence unless it was corroborated or accepted by the COO. [read post]
25 Mar 2024, 11:27 pm
, RdC 423 (2022), Chapter V, paras. 224-281). [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 1:30 am
–RDC], but it ain’t what I’d call proof of harm — irreparable or otherwise. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 7:40 am
--RDC], but it ain’t why I’d call proof of harm, irreparable or otherwise. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm
--RDC], but it ain’t what I’d call proof of harm — irreparable or otherwise. [read post]
8 Mar 2018, 2:38 am
168/05, Mostaza Claro, EU:C:2006:675. [12] It is interesting to note that the concerns of the ECJ (paras 50 ss) regarding the intervention of investment arbitration by courts of EU Member States did not apply to the case at hand as German arbitration law permits a review of the award (section 1059 ZPO). [read post]
16 Apr 2021, 1:36 am
Weller, RdC, forthcoming). [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 11:44 pm
Matthias Weller, RdC 423 [2022], at para. 251, on Art. 14(1) of the CEMAC 2004 Agreement and on comparable national rules). [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 1:33 pm
This is in the interest of all our stakeholders. [read post]
28 Nov 2012, 7:06 am
in considering the strength of domestic trademark rights based on international fame, i.e., the "famous marks doctrine," at least in the Second Circuit -- RDC.] [read post]
15 Dec 2022, 5:56 pm
Charging the refusal to grant accommodation arges this alleged conduct violates Title VII, the EEOC filed suit (Civil Action No. 1:22-CV-4953 MLB RDC) in U.S. [read post]
2 Dec 2013, 5:05 am
-- RDC]. [read post]
4 Apr 2017, 11:27 am
It is already interesting, but even in a more interesting way than is apparent. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
One current example is the ongoing discussion about the Heidelberg Report2 which proposes to replace the so-called arbitration exception of Article 1 (2)(d) of the Brussels I Regulation (JR) by two new articles which shall address positively the interfaces between arbitration and the Regulation and strengthen arbitration within the European Judicial Area.3 The following article first delineates the background of the present discussion (II), than it briefly presents the proposals of the Heidelberg… [read post]
28 Oct 2016, 11:41 am
— RDC] can, however, be rendered invalid and cancelled if it has come to be “the generic name for the goods or services, or a portion thereof, for which it is registered . . . [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:18 pm
— RDC LIKELIHOOD OF CONFUSION® is privileged to host the Blawg Review of Lights on this festive night! [read post]
