Search for: "State of Alabama v. United States" Results 1 - 20 of 2,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 9:05 pm by Tyler Hoguet
Yet, workplace regulation in the United States heavily relies on complaints that employees file. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm by Ilya Somin
Story, Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States, 3:674-75, § 1800 (1833), and "place the citizens of each State upon the same footing with citizens of other States. [read post]
19 Apr 2024, 9:27 am by CFM Admin
The court granted the SEC’s summary judgment motion in part, holding that the defendants had offered and sold unregistered securities since it found that TerraUSD, LUNA and MIR tokens were investment contracts under United States v. [read post]
8 Apr 2024, 10:08 am by admin
Many of the silicone cases were pending in a multi-district litigation, MDL 926, before Judge Sam Pointer, in the Northern District of Alabama. [read post]
7 Apr 2024, 8:12 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Professor Andrew Morriss suggests that we may have seen this dynamic in action in the Alabama legislature's response to LePage v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am by Adam Ziegler
We’d all been working for over a year on a contract that would make it possible, someday in the future, for everyone to have free and open access to all the official court decisions ever published in the United States. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 10:54 am by Cassie J. Edgar
Constitutionality On March 1, 2024, the Corporate Transparency Act met a judicial roadblock in National Small Business United v. [read post]
14 Mar 2024, 7:24 am by Holly
District Court for the Northern District of Alabama ruled that the Corporate Transparency Act is unconstitutional in National Small Business United v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 10:03 am by Sarah E. Straub
Recently, all eyes in the legal community turned to a federal district court in Alabama in the case of National Small Business United v. [read post]
13 Mar 2024, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
  As Hasen recounts (p. 23), the Supreme Court shamefully refused to intervene in Alabama’s blatantly racist denial of voting rights in Giles v. [read post]