Search for: "State of Alaska v. Merck & Co., Inc."
Results 1 - 15
of 15
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
Rev. 2550, 2550 (June 2001).AlabamaEx parte Household Retail Services, Inc., 744 So.2d 871, 880 n. 2 (Ala. 1999); Ex parte Exxon Corp., 725 So.2d 930, 933 n.3 (Ala. 1998).AlaskaWe didn’t find anything useful along these lines under Alaska law.ArizonaOsuna v. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 12:30 pm
As we predicted, see Merck Lawyer Takes Nicks on Question of Timely Securities Complaint in Supreme Court, the Supreme Court in 2010 agreed with us in Merck & Co. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Upjohn Co., 835 P.2d 1189, 1200 (Alaska 1992); Polley v. [read post]
19 Feb 2009, 12:55 am
" Alaska Electrical Pension Fund, et al. v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at… [read post]
17 Oct 2013, 5:00 am
Squibb & Sons, Inc. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
Co. v. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 12:46 pm
Upjohn Co., 835 P.2d 1189, 1200 & n.17 (Alaska 1992). [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 10:37 am
Upjohn Co., 835 P.2d 1189, 1200 & n.17 (Alaska 1992).Arkansas: West v. [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 12:41 pm
A broader formulation exempts anything that is government "regulated" (Alaska, Nebraska, Oklahoma). [read post]
15 Mar 2007, 6:33 am
Merck & Co., 2007 WL 188264, at *3 (D. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 4:29 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 836-38 (Conn. 2001); Coyle v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Upjohn Co., 778 A.2d 829, 846 (Conn. 2001); Niemiera v. [read post]
15 Sep 2011, 5:00 am
Alaska 1987). [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 3:18 pm
At least the state of the art at the time of the plaintiff’s use applies – unknown and later discovered risks are irrelevant. [read post]
