Search for: "State of CT Dept of Children "
Results 41 - 60
of 189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2011, 8:05 am
The mother appeared pro se by telephone at Family Court's first two hearings, but she withheld her out-of-state address from the father because she alleged that she and the children were fearful of him. [read post]
8 Jun 2019, 5:43 am
Slip Op. 03855 (3 Dept., 2019) the Plaintiff (wife) and defendant (husband) were married in 2003 and had one child (born in 2002). [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 1:27 pm
IWP had three children, FPG, MP and SP, all of whom survived the decedent. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 10:14 am
This includes tracing the proceeds from the sale of the real property” (Matter of Conklin, supra at *6 [relying on Labella v Goodman,198 AD2d 332 [2d Dept 1993]; see also Matter of Wallace, 86 Misc 2d 175, 180 [Sur Ct, Cattaraugus County 1976] [opining proceeds of a sale of specifically bequeathed property “do not constitute the legacy bequeathed,” and thus, “the general rule of ademption applies and the legacy fails”]). [read post]
13 Dec 2023, 7:47 am
Ct, 2023) the action was commenced with the Plaintiff’s filing of a Summons with Notice. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
Ct. [read post]
2 Dec 2018, 7:49 am
Ct. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 10:42 am
Emergency Jurisdiction Continues Under UCCJEA for More than Three Years Where Family Court Not Satisfied With Steps to Protect Children Taken by Home State of New Mexico Court In Matter of Bridget Y, --- N.Y.S.2d ----, 2011 WL 6848352 (N.Y.A.D. 4 Dept.), a 3-2 decison, the primary issue raised was whether Family Court properly exercised temporary emergency jurisdiction over the children pursuant to Domestic Relations Law 76-c (3). [read post]
16 Jul 2014, 5:07 am
Ct., Queens 1979), a New York court stated that “a pet is ‘somewhere in between a person and a personal piece of property. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 3:00 am
Ct., Kings Co., 2014). [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am
Civil Rights Law section 65 was amended to provide that any person may elect to resume the use of a former middle name upon divorce or annulment and that the state shall not impose a fee to change the middle name on a state identifying document due to a change in marital status. [read post]
10 Dec 2014, 9:00 am
(N.Y. trial ct. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 7:02 am
the Supreme Court concluded that the proposition that before a parent can be compelled to contribute towards the cost of a private college there must be a showing that a child cannot receive an adequate education at a state college is a doctrine that in many cases is harmful to the children of divorced parents, acts to discriminate against them, and is largely unworkable. [read post]
5 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
Children of the decedent are next. [read post]
15 Aug 2020, 4:29 am
Tracy C., 209 AD2d 955, 955 (4th Dept. 1994))); Pacheco v. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 1:49 am
., 42 Misc 3d 1208, 2014 NY Slip Op 50011(U) [Sup Ct, NY County Jan. 6, 2014], a lawsuit involving a family-owned publishing business in which Justice Eileen Bransten upheld a stock voting agreement that gave board control to the minority shareholders/step-children of the majority shareholder, although she allowed the majority owner’s suit to proceed on a claim challenging the authenticity of her late husband’s signature on the voting agreement. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 11:29 pm
Respondent's stated expenses were more than twice the income reflected on her tax return. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Slip Op. 05736 (1st Dept., 2018), a support proceeding, the Appellate Division held that Family Court erred in determining that the Children’s Law Center (CLC) which had been appointed as attorney for the child with no limitations on the scope of its representation did not have standing to file objections in Family Court. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 6:10 am
Slip Op. 05736 (1st Dept., 2018), a support proceeding, the Appellate Division held that Family Court erred in determining that the Children’s Law Center (CLC) which had been appointed as attorney for the child with no limitations on the scope of its representation did not have standing to file objections in Family Court. [read post]
