Search for: "State of CT Dept of Children " Results 81 - 100 of 189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2014, 6:21 am by Robert Harper
  Indeed, courts have found that testators had testamentary capacity, even though the testators were afflicted with ongoing mental illness (see Matter of Esberg, 215 AD2d 655 [2d Dept 1995]), progressive dementia (see Matter of Friedman, 26 AD3d 723 [3d Dept 2006]), and physical weakness (see Matter of Swain, 125 AD2d 574 [2d Dept 1986]). [read post]
24 Dec 2018, 4:37 am by Franklin C. McRoberts
” Sure enough, the Appellate Division eventually affirmed, 74 AD3d 442 [1st Dept 2010], as did the New York State Court of Appeals, 18 NY3d 846 [2011]. [read post]
30 Nov 2011, 3:56 am by Joel R. Brandes
As such, Family Court was without jurisdiction to entertain this petition (Family Ct Act 812). [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 11:08 am by Tana Fye
  It defined “Indian child” the same way the ICWA defines the term and declares:(a)        The Legislature finds and declares the following:(1)  There is no resource that is more vital to the continued existence and integrity of Indian tribes than their children, and the State of California has an interest in protecting Indian children who are members of, or are eligible for membership in, and Indian tribe.(2) … [read post]
16 May 2011, 5:21 am by Joel R. Brandes
Although child support arrears cease to accrue above the sum of $500 where a noncustodial parent can establish that his or her income is less than or equal to poverty income guidelines amount for a single person, as reported by the United States Department of Health and Human Services (see Family Ct Act 413[1][g] ), a "modification, set aside or vacatur [of a child support obligation set forth in a judgment or order] shall not reduce or annul child support arrears accrued… [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 1:10 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Ct. 2056, 2069-71 (2016) (Sotomayor, J., dissenting). [2] [Dept. of Justice, Civil Rights Div., Investigation of the Newark Police Department 8, 19, n. 15  [2069]  (2014), online at https://www.justice.gov/sites /default/files/crt/legacy/2014/07/22/newark_findings_7-22-14.pdf.] at 8, [3] See M. [read post]