Search for: "State of California, et al v. EPA, et al"
Results 1 - 20
of 87
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Mar 2024, 7:42 am
Instead, FOIAonline was a consolidated starting point, managed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), that let you file Freedom of Information Act requests with numerous federal entities from within a single digital interface. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 12:44 pm
Balaam (Habeas Petition; Indian Civil Rights Act) California Valley Miwok Tribe, et al. v. [read post]
16 Nov 2023, 10:34 am
” In the recent decision Nat’l Association of Wheat Growers, et al. v. [read post]
14 Nov 2023, 11:58 am
” In the recent decision Nat’l Association of Wheat Growers, et al. v. [read post]
4 Oct 2023, 3:02 pm
United States Department of the Interior, et al. [read post]
16 Aug 2023, 1:36 pm
Johnson, et al. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Pending Bills California’s financial climate risk disclosure bill, known as the Climate-Related Financial Risk Act (SB 261), passed the State Senate on May 30 with a vote of 27-8 and is now before the state Assembly.[13] It would require covered businesses with annual gross revenues of more than $500 million to prepare and make public a “climate-related financial risk report disclosing the entity’s climate-related financial risk and measures adopted to… [read post]
26 Apr 2023, 3:54 pm
(Federal Recognition; Tribal Court Judgment) Greene, et al. v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 8:10 am
James, et. al. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 4:42 pm
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) released a proposed consent decree intended to resolve the case, Center for Food Safety, et al. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 9:05 pm
”[5] At the same time, the SEC found, such disclosure would “promote the purposes of” the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (“NEPA”), which was adopted months before President Nixon created the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). [read post]
13 May 2022, 4:36 am
EPA, 878 F.3d 779, 786 (9th Cir. 2017)). [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:23 am
In the 2020 decision for National Association of Wheat Growers et al. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2021, 2:17 pm
Kehm v. [read post]
29 Sep 2021, 11:31 am
District Court for the District of Arizona issued an order in Pasqua Yaqui Tribe, et al. v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 9:52 am
Additionally, Monsanto admitted that it never conducted any long-term carcinogenicity studies on any of the formulations that it’s sold in the United States.Holding:The Court held that the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIRRA) 7 U.S.C. ch. 6 §136 et al. does not preempt state law. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 10:53 am
Although EPA initially chose to exclude these uses from its analysis, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ordered EPA to include them following a successful legal challenge lodged by consumer groups in Safer Chemicals Healthy Families, et al. v. [read post]
10 Nov 2020, 3:00 am
Donald Glaser et al., 937 F.3d 1191 (9th Cir. 2019), on remand, 2020 U.S. [read post]
17 Jul 2020, 3:00 am
§ 791a et seq.) preempt application of the California Environmental Quality Act (Pub. [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 4:15 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of California granted summary judgment for the Plaintiffs in National Association of Wheat Growers et. al. v. [read post]
